BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11359263)

  • 1. Influence of prosthesis material on the loading of implants that support a fixed partial prosthesis: in vivo study.
    Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11359263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prostheses: an in vivo study.
    Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Oct; 11(5):465-75. PubMed ID: 11168239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses.
    Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 20236236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress on implant-supported fixed prostheses with different numbers of abutments after the application of acrylic resin.
    Palmeiro MR; Barcellos LH; Naconecy M; Geremia T; Cervieri A; Shinkai RS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 25749084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study.
    Johansson LA; Ekfeldt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 12737250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of an implant-assisted removable partial denture during bilateral loading: occlusal rests position.
    Shahmiri R; Das R; Aarts JM; Bennani V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1126-33. PubMed ID: 24951387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
    Ciftçi Y; Canay S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study.
    Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre-load on oral implants after screw tightening fixed full prostheses: an in vivo study.
    Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 28(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 11350577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.
    Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complications in the tissue integrated prostheses components: clinical and mechanical evaluation.
    Kohavi D
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Jul; 20(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 8350176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.
    Law C; Bennani V; Lyons K; Swain M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24388719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of implant number on transverse bending moments during simulated unilateral loading of mandibular fixed-detachable prostheses.
    Korioth TW; Chew CB; Chung DH
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 9835836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An In Vivo Study on Load Distribution in Different Implant Configurations for Supporting Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Kobari H; Yoda N; Chen J; Kawata T; Sasaki K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 27632259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fabrication of a screw-retained fixed provisional prosthesis supported by dental implants.
    Kökat AM; Akça K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Mar; 91(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15060503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microstrains around standard and mini implants supporting different bridge designs.
    Sallam H; Kheiralla LS; Aldawakly A
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 20712439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stress Distribution Study Using the Finite Element Method in Three Different Implant-Supported Fixed Complete-Arch Mandibular Prostheses.
    Coelho LF; Broilo JR; Sartori EA; Mariano LO; Geremia T; Barcellos L; Corso LL; Shinkai RS; Grossi ML
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 27148996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant survival and prosthetic complications of mandibular metal-acrylic resin implant complete fixed dental prostheses.
    Priest G; Smith J; Wilson MG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):466-75. PubMed ID: 24388718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.