These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11359284)

  • 21. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth.
    Barr ES; Kleier DJ; Barr NV
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 10730297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tools to judge the quality of an endodontic system.
    Musikant BL
    Dent Today; 2009 Jul; 28(7):88, 90. PubMed ID: 19630280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rotary instrumentation: asking the right questions, part 1.
    McSpadden J; Mounce R
    Dent Today; 2004 Jul; 23(7):88, 90-1. PubMed ID: 15354655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The evolution of instrumentation and obturation leading to a simplified approach.
    Musikant BL; Cohen BI; Deutsch AS
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Nov; 21(11):980-6, 988, 990. PubMed ID: 11968149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes in root canal morphology in simulated curved canals over-instrumented with a variety of stainless steel and nickel titanium files.
    Lam TV; Lewis DJ; Atkins DR; Macfarlane RH; Clarkson RM; Whitehead MG; Brockhurst PJ; Moule AJ
    Aust Dent J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 10217015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals.
    Kum KY; Spängberg L; Cha BY; Il-Young J; Msd ; Seung-Jong L; Chan-Young L
    J Endod; 2000 Dec; 26(12):719-23. PubMed ID: 11471641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative analysis of curved root canal preparation using nickel-titanium instruments with or without EDTA.
    Bramante CM; Betti LV
    J Endod; 2000 May; 26(5):278-80. PubMed ID: 11199735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy.
    Canoglu H; Tekcicek MU; Cehreli ZC
    Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 17249433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
    D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files.
    Yared GM; Dagher FE; Machtou P; Kulkarni GK
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11858204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of root canal preparation using reciprocating Safesiders stainless steel and Vortex nickel-titanium instruments.
    Rhodes SC; Hülsmann M; McNeal SF; Beck P; Eleazer PD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 May; 111(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 21411348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
    Park H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tips to avoid instrument separation in endodontics.
    Mullane EM
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2015; 61(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 26506698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Re: A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
    Moinzadeh A; De Bruyne M
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):451-2; author reply 453. PubMed ID: 20518940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding and evaluating the endodontic file.
    Bahcall JK; Barss JT
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):690-2. PubMed ID: 12004664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
    Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The ProTaper technique: endodontics made easier.
    Ruddle CJ
    Dent Today; 2001 Nov; 20(11):58-64, 66-8. PubMed ID: 11715650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Advantages and limits of nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation. A review of the current literature].
    Taschieri S; Necchi S; Rosano G; Del Fabbro M; Weinstein R; Machtou P
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2005; 115(11):1000-5. PubMed ID: 16342639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of root canal preparation using Flex Master Ni-Ti and Endo-Eze AET stainless steel instruments.
    Nordmeyer S; Schnell V; Hülsmann M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 21167758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Broken instrument removal. The endodontic challenge.
    Ruddle CJ
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):70-2, 74, 76 passim. PubMed ID: 12242838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.