These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1136032)

  • 21. [Incidence and mortality of uterine cervix cancer in Norway. When do we get organized nation-wide cytologic screening in Norway?].
    Magnus K; Langmark F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May; 110(12):1557-9. PubMed ID: 2187277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Screening profile of women who have died from cervical cancer].
    Ejersbo D
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 18307959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Screening for cervical cancer in East Germany--a progress report].
    Ebeling K; Nischan P
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1986; 80(7):278-305. PubMed ID: 3487887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A comparison between mass screening for uterine neck cancer in the Districts of Frederiksberg and Maribo].
    Koch F; Klinken L; Albrechtsen R
    Nord Med; 1971 Dec; 86(50):1534. PubMed ID: 5135061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Cytological cervical examinations in women developing cancer of the uterine cervix compared with the figures of similar studies in a healthy control group].
    Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1987 Aug; 149(33):2229-32. PubMed ID: 3450039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix uteri (author's transl)].
    Sachs H; Hasche C
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 4435345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An assessment of the effectiveness of cervical cytology screening in Sheffield.
    Johnson IS; Milner PC; Todd JN
    Community Med; 1987 May; 9(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 3608418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cancer of the cervix--problems and challenge of the 3rd millennium.
    Chowdhury NN
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2000 Feb; 98(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11016147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patterns of cervical cancer risk in Kentucky.
    Hopenhayn C; Tucker T; Christian A; Christian WJ
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2007 May; 105(5):205-8. PubMed ID: 17566462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix].
    Berget A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jul; 137(27):1558-9. PubMed ID: 1145871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Geographical differences in cervix cytology screening and the incidence of cervix cancer 1943-1982].
    Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1984 Nov; 146(45):3477-82. PubMed ID: 6515975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of population screening on morbidity and mortality of cancer of the uterine cervix in Maribo Amt.
    Berget A
    Dan Med Bull; 1979 Apr; 26(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 436462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
    Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical cancer screening and the role of the physician.
    Schultz R
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1994 Apr; 83(4):199-200. PubMed ID: 8006545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Mortality from cancer of the cervix in Chile (author's transl)].
    Dabancens A; Pasternak S
    Rev Med Chil; 1979 May; 107(5):447-51. PubMed ID: 515590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Interviews with women in the county of Vasa failing to participate in vaginal cytologic mass screening].
    Fortelius P; Haapoja H; Hakulinen T
    Lakartidningen; 1974 Sep; 71(37):3385-7. PubMed ID: 4409895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved prognosis for cervical cancers due to comprehensive screening.
    Macgregor JE; Fraser ME; Mann EM
    Acta Cytol; 1972; 16(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 4501868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Management of abnormal cervical smears.
    Br Med J; 1980 May; 280(6226):1239-40. PubMed ID: 7388485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.