BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11361101)

  • 1. Comparison of three closure methods and two absorbable suture materials for closure of jejunal enterotomy incisions in healthy dogs.
    Kirpensteijn J; Maarschalkerweerd RJ; van der Gaag I; Kooistra HS; van Sluijs FJ
    Vet Q; 2001 Apr; 23(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11361101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo assessment of absorbable knotless barbed suture for single layer gastrotomy and enterotomy closure.
    Ehrhart NP; Kaminskaya K; Miller JA; Zaruby JF
    Vet Surg; 2013 Feb; 42(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 23373618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
    Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of 2 different suture patterns for skin closure of canine ovariohysterectomy.
    Sylvestre A; Wilson J; Hare J
    Can Vet J; 2002 Sep; 43(9):699-702. PubMed ID: 12240527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of suture materials and suture patterns for inverting intestinal anastomosis of the jejunum in the horse.
    Dean PW; Robertson JT; Jacobs RM
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Oct; 46(10):2072-7. PubMed ID: 3904546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Knotless Barbed Suture Versus Monofilament Suture in the Oral Cavity of Cats.
    Durand CL
    J Vet Dent; 2017 Sep; 34(3):148-154. PubMed ID: 28635369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro bursting pressures of jejunal enterotomy closures in llamas.
    Semevolos SA; Reed SK; Gamble K
    Vet Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 17214822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ex vivo comparison of barbed sutures for pelvic flexure enterotomy in horses.
    Sinovich M; Archer DC; Meunier NV; Kelly PG
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 31724764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esophagotomy closure in the dog. A comparison of a double-layer appositional and two single-layer appositional techniques.
    Oakes MG; Hosgood G; Snider TG; Hedlund CS; Crawford MP
    Vet Surg; 1993; 22(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 8116200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Testing and Histologic Examination of Intradermal Skin Closure in Dogs Using Barbed Suture Device and Non-Barbed Monofilament Suture.
    Law AY; Butler JR; Patnaik SS; Cooley JA; Elder SH
    Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 27805732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of continuous intradermal with simple interrupted suture pattern: an experimental study in dogs.
    Gouletsou PG; Prassinos NN; Papazoglou LG; Kostoulas P; Galatos AD
    Top Companion Anim Med; 2020 Nov; 41():100454. PubMed ID: 32823154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a barbed suture device versus conventional suture in a canine enterotomy model.
    Miller J; Zaruby J; Kaminskaya K
    J Invest Surg; 2012 Apr; 25(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 22439837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of leakage pressure following enterotomy closure reinforced by tissue adhesive in a caprine cadaver model.
    Jones CT; Chen CY; Campbell BG; Fransson BA
    N Z Vet J; 2017 Sep; 65(5):248-251. PubMed ID: 28629261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of initial leak pressures after single- and double-layer cystotomy closure with barbed and nonbarbed monofilament suture material in an ex vivo ovine model.
    Duffy DJ; Kindra CG; Moore GE
    Vet Surg; 2019 Apr; 48(3):424-430. PubMed ID: 30635932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for intradermal skin closure in cats.
    Papazoglou LG; Tsioli V; Papaioannou N; Georgiadis M; Savvas I; Prassinos N; Kouti V; Bikiaris D; Hadzigiannakis C; Zavros N
    Can Vet J; 2010 Jul; 51(7):770-2. PubMed ID: 20885834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cystotomy closure. A comparison of the strength of appositional and inverting suture patterns.
    Radasch RM; Merkley DF; Wilson JW; Barstad RD
    Vet Surg; 1990; 19(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 2200200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of cyanoacrylate on leakage pressures of cooled canine cadaveric jejunal enterotomies.
    Thompson JL; Miller L; Bowlt Blacklock K
    Vet Surg; 2024 Feb; 53(2):367-375. PubMed ID: 38071682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of skin staples with sutures for anastomosis of the small intestine in dogs.
    Coolman BR; Ehrhart N; Pijanowski G; Ehrhart EJ; Coolman SL
    Vet Surg; 2000; 29(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 10917278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of stainless steel fascial staples and polypropylene suture material for closure of the linea alba in dogs.
    Kirpensteijn J; Fingland RB; Boyer JE; Kennedy GA; Klemm RD; Debowes RM
    Vet Surg; 1993; 22(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 8116202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo assessment of an absorbable and nonabsorbable knotless barbed suture for laparoscopic single-layer enterotomy closure: a clinical and biomechanical comparison against nonbarbed suture.
    Omotosho P; Yurcisin B; Ceppa E; Miller J; Kirsch D; Portenier DD
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Dec; 21(10):893-7. PubMed ID: 22129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.