BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11361101)

  • 21. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of two suture materials for intradermal skin closure in dogs.
    Kirpensteijn J; Maarschalkerweerd RJ; Koeman JP; Kooistra HS; van Sluijs FJ
    Vet Q; 1997 Mar; 19(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 9225425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material.
    Talpur AA; Awan MS; Surhio AR
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 24800342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of short-term complication rates between dogs and cats undergoing appositional single-layer or inverting double-layer cystotomy closure: 144 cases (1993-2010).
    Thieman-Mankin KM; Ellison GW; Jeyapaul CJ; Glotfelty-Ortiz CS
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Jan; 240(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 22171757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of anastomoses of small intestine in dogs: crushing versus noncrushing suturing techniques.
    Bone DL; Duckett KE; Patton CS; Krahwinkel DJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1983 Nov; 44(11):2043-8. PubMed ID: 6359979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of surgical time and complication rate of subcutaneous and skin closure using barbed suture or traditional knotted suture in dogs.
    Nutt LK; Wilson ML; Sakals S
    Can Vet J; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 29203937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Monofilament vs multifilament suture for uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.
    Saccone G; De Angelis MC; Zizolfi B; Gragnano E; Musone M; Zullo F; Bifulco G; Di Spiezio Sardo A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 May; 4(3):100592. PubMed ID: 35131497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure: biomechanical wound strength and histology.
    Zaruby J; Gingras K; Taylor J; Maul D
    Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Feb; 31(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 21317121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Closure of gastrointestinal incisions using skin staples alone and in combination with suture in 29 cats.
    Schwartz Z; Coolman BR
    J Small Anim Pract; 2018 May; 59(5):281-285. PubMed ID: 29617039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ex vivo comparison of intradermal closures with conventional monofilament suture vs unidirectional barbed suture in dogs.
    Regier PJ; Smeak DD; McGilvray KC
    Vet Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(8):1399-1405. PubMed ID: 31271237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Continuous absorbable suture pattern in the closure of ventral midline abdominal incisions in horses.
    Turner AS; Yovich JV; White NA; Embertson RE; Santschi EM; Slone DE
    Equine Vet J; 1988 Nov; 20(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 3215164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of a continuous suture pattern with a simple interrupted pattern for enteric closure in dogs and cats: 83 cases (1991-1997).
    Weisman DL; Smeak DD; Birchard SJ; Zweigart SL
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1999 May; 214(10):1507-10. PubMed ID: 10340077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision.
    Israelsson LA; Millbourn D
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Oct; 93(5):1027-40. PubMed ID: 24035074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Closure of median sternotomy in dogs: suture versus wire.
    Pelsue DH; Monnet E; Gaynor JS; Powers BE; Halling K; Parker D; Golden A
    J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2002; 38(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 12428890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of 3 suture closure techniques for pelvic flexure enterotomy in equine cadaveric large colon.
    Aldrich ED; Earnest J; Moorman VJ
    Vet Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(3):417-421. PubMed ID: 28158935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parallel alternating sliding knots are effective for ligation of mesenteric arteries during resection and anastomosis of the equine jejunum.
    Gandini M; Giusto G; Comino F; Pagliara E
    BMC Vet Res; 2014; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10. PubMed ID: 25238115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hydrosonographic Assessment of the Effect of Two Different Suture Materials on Healing of the Uterine Scar after Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Sevket O; Takmaz T; Ozcan P; Halici BNA; Islek SH
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2021 Apr; 225(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 32588418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs.
    Giusto G; Iussich S; Tursi M; Perona G; Gandini M
    Acta Vet Scand; 2019 Jan; 61(1):3. PubMed ID: 30611301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the healing of prescrotal urethrotomy incisions in the dog: sutured versus nonsutured.
    Weber WJ; Boothe HW; Brassard JA; Hobson HP
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Jun; 46(6):1309-15. PubMed ID: 3927800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.