224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11365189)
21. EEOC is making quick work of AIDS job-bias litigation. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Sep; 10(16):6. PubMed ID: 11362771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bragdon v. Abbott: extending the Americans with Disability Act to asymptomatic individuals.
Liu E
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):382-408. PubMed ID: 15015486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Domestic AIDS vaccine trials: addressing the potential for social harm to the subjects of human experiments.
Leider PA
Calif Law Rev; 2000; 88():1185-232. PubMed ID: 11067733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. HIV, the ADA, and the duty to treat.
Shepherd L
Houst Law Rev; 2000; 37(4):1055-100. PubMed ID: 12071219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Health care professionals and treatment of HIV-positive patients. Is there an affirmative duty to treat under common law, the Rehabilitation Act, or the Americans with Disabilities Act?
White CC
J Leg Med; 1999 Mar; 20(1):67-113. PubMed ID: 10230151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Disability Act umbrella covers asymptomatic HIV.
AIDS Alert; 1997 May; 12(5):52-4. PubMed ID: 11364220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Supreme Court confronts AIDS.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Apr; 13(7):1, 6-11. PubMed ID: 11365301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 'Mitigating measures' cases won't affect HIV plaintiffs.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Jul; 14(13):9. PubMed ID: 11366607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Supreme Court leaves intact ruling permitting AIDS caps.
AIDS Policy Law; 2000 Jan; 15(1):1,6. PubMed ID: 11367211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Asymptomatic HIV as a disability under the Americans with Disability Act.
Chambers EC
Wash Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 73(2):403-31. PubMed ID: 12465639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Court considers dentist's claim that ADA doesn't apply to HIV.
AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Nov; 11(21):1, 14-5. PubMed ID: 11364039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 7th Circuit will not reconsider its ruling on AIDS caps.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Aug; 14(15):3. PubMed ID: 11366617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bragdon v. Abbott, asymptomatic genetic conditions, and antidiscrimination law: a conservative perspective.
Clegg R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):409-29. PubMed ID: 15015487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Dental group argues that asymptomatic HIV is no disability.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Mar; 13(5):7. PubMed ID: 11365204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Supreme Court to hear trio of ADA employment cases.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Feb; 14(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11366268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Genetic discrimination: Huntington's disease and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Gin BR
Columbia Law Rev; 1997 Jun; 97(5):1406-34. PubMed ID: 10175166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. U.S. Supreme Court refuses appeal on union seniority issue.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Apr; 12(7):3. PubMed ID: 11364233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Senators seek to reverse Supreme Court on disability rights.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 13(17):4. PubMed ID: 11365755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. U.S. Supreme Court rules that Americans With Disabilities Act covers asymptomatic HIV infection.
Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Aug; 49(8):1108-9. PubMed ID: 9712225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]