108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11367274)
61. Re: "Named reporting and mandatory partner notification in New York State: the effect on consent for perinatal HIV testing".
Birkhead GS; Tesoriero J; Warren B; Wade N
J Urban Health; 2003 Mar; 80(1):167-8; author reply 169-70. PubMed ID: 12612106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Three States moving toward mandatory reporting of HIV.
AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Feb; 11(3):5. PubMed ID: 11363177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Criminal exposure.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Sep; 14(16):12. PubMed ID: 11366904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Prison employees not immune from HIV disclosure suit.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Apr; 14(8):2. PubMed ID: 11366534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. [Mandatory notification of HIV infection. Epidemiologic justifications and ethical questioning].
Antoniotti S; Manuel C; Sapin C; Auquier P; San Marco JL
Sante Publique; 2002 Mar; 14(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 12073406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Texas to switch from codes to names to track HIV cases.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Feb; 13(3):1, 11. PubMed ID: 11365092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. The Alabama Infected Health Care Worker Act. State Department of Public Health.
Ala Med; 1995 Jan; 64(7):14-9. PubMed ID: 7872161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Legal and ethical implications of opt-out HIV testing.
Hanssens C
Clin Infect Dis; 2007 Dec; 45 Suppl 4():S232-9. PubMed ID: 18190292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Supporting and advocating for HIV-positive health care workers.
Schatz B
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1995; 72(1 Suppl):263-72. PubMed ID: 8535433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Court redefines standard for HIV transmission risk.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Apr; 14(8):1, 6-8. PubMed ID: 11366525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. The Tennessee HIV Pregnancy Screening Act of 1997.
Moore WL
Tenn Med; 1999 Apr; 92(4):141-2. PubMed ID: 10194983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. What's in a name?
Millman S
Body Posit; 1999 Jan; 12(1):10-5, 17. PubMed ID: 11366102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Duty to recontact: a legal harbinger?
Knoppers BM
Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):277. PubMed ID: 11746005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. CDC recommends all States make anonymous HIV testing available. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
AIDS Alert; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11366086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Lookbacks for HIV infected health care workers.
Robinson E; Joce R; O'Donovan D; Bruce M; Gaudoin J; Iversen A; Hargreaves R; Hamilton G
Commun Dis Public Health; 2000 Jun; 3(2):143-4. PubMed ID: 10902263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. It's the law. What is?
Body Posit; 1999 Mar; 12(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 11366291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Conflicting messages: how criminal HIV disclosure laws undermine public health efforts to control the spread of HIV.
Galletly CL; Pinkerton SD
AIDS Behav; 2006 Sep; 10(5):451-61. PubMed ID: 16804750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Is under-reporting of AIDS a problem in Jamaica?
Figueroa JP; Brathwaite AR
West Indian Med J; 1995 Jun; 44(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 7667970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. California: AB 2812 would outlaw anonymous testing.
James JS
AIDS Treat News; 1996 Apr; (no 244):8. PubMed ID: 11363309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [Precarious conditions for controlling the HIV epidemic].
Noguer I; Tello O; Pollán M; López-Abente G; Hernández Pezzi G
Gac Sanit; 2005; 19(5):351-3. PubMed ID: 16242091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]