These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11367817)

  • 1. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in a rural Minnesota hospital.
    Tietz C
    Minn Med; 2001 Apr; 84(4):47-9. PubMed ID: 11367817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy in a rural Minnesota hospital.
    Tietz CA
    Minn Med; 1995 Dec; 78(12):31-2, 52-3. PubMed ID: 8569650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.
    Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies.
    Abdollahi SF; Bahlouli A; Mostafa PG; Rasooli S; Morteza G
    Saudi Med J; 2009 Jun; 30(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 19526166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
    Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.
    Hur HC; Guido RS; Mansuria SM; Hacker MR; Sanfilippo JS; Lee TT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 17478361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
    Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual physician experience with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in a single outpatient setting.
    McClellan SN; Hamilton B; Rettenmaier MA; Lopez K; John CR; Hu JC; Goldstein BH
    Surg Innov; 2007 Jun; 14(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 17558015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. A comparison of morbidity and mortality results with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Lyons TL
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Oct; 38(10):763-7. PubMed ID: 8263863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique.
    Bojahr B; Raatz D; Schonleber G; Abri C; Ohlinger R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16698522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
    Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Hysterectomies in patients with no history of vaginal delivery. A study of 243 cases].
    Dhainaut C; Salomon LJ; Junger M; Marcollet A; Madelenat P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005; 33(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 15752660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outpatient laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with assistance of the lap loop.
    Lieng M; Istre O; Langebrekke A; Jungersen M; Busund B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 15922989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy.
    Altgassen C; Michels W; Schneider A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 104(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 15292004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Kluivers KB; Hendriks JC; Mol BW; Bongers MY; Bremer GL; de Vet HC; Vierhout ME; Brolmann HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17368247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A review of 445 cases of laparoscopic hysterectomy: benefits and outcome].
    Malzoni M; Perniola G; Hannuna K; Iuele T; Fruscella ML; Basili R; Ebano V; Marziani R
    Clin Ter; 2004 Jan; 155(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 15147074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.