These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11367849)
1. [Multi-slice spiral CT of the abdomen in oncological patients: influence of table support and detector configuration on image quality and radiation exposure]. Wessling J; Fischbach R; Ludwig K; Juergens KU; Schaller S; Fallenberg EM; Lenzen H; Heindel W Rofo; 2001 Apr; 173(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 11367849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Chest examination protocol with a reduced dose using a multi-slice spiral CT]. Rehbock B; Hieckel HG Rofo; 2003 Jul; 175(7):963-6. PubMed ID: 12847652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance. Lurz M; Lell MM; Wuest W; Eller A; Scharf M; Uder M; May MS Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):352-60. PubMed ID: 25591129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. McCollough CH; Zink FE Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2223-30. PubMed ID: 10587202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. Kachelriess M; Ulzheimer S; Kalender WA Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1881-902. PubMed ID: 10984235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. Kalra MK; Maher MM; Toth TL; Kamath RS; Halpern EF; Saini S Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15286306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical Note: Increased photon starvation artifacts at low helical pitch in ultra-low-dose CT. Browne JE; Bruesewitz MR; Vrieze TJ; McCollough CH; Yu L Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5538-5543. PubMed ID: 31580485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. Kalra MK; Prasad S; Saini S; Blake MA; Varghese J; Halpern EF; Thrall JH; Rhea JT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1101-6. PubMed ID: 12388481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of high-pitch dual-source CT to compensate motion artifacts: a phantom study. Farshad-Amacker NA; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T Acad Radiol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):1234-9. PubMed ID: 24029055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. Solomon JB; Li X; Samei E AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23436849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom. Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]