These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11368528)

  • 21. Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments.
    Ben-Shachar M; Palti D; Grodzinsky Y
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1320-36. PubMed ID: 15050558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Persistence of Initial Misanalysis With No Referential Ambiguity.
    Nakamura C; Arai M
    Cogn Sci; 2016 May; 40(4):909-40. PubMed ID: 26190480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
    Kuperberg GR
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():23-49. PubMed ID: 17400197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Testing the shared resource assumption in theories of text processing.
    Rawson KA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Mar; 54(2):155-83. PubMed ID: 16893536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty.
    van Schijndel M; Linzen T
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12988. PubMed ID: 34170031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.
    Christianson K; Luke SG; Hussey EK; Wochna KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1380-1405. PubMed ID: 27150840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: an electrophysiological differentiation.
    Kaan E; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 12590846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Monitoring in language perception: evidence from ERPs in a picture-sentence matching task.
    Vissers CT; Kolk HH; van de Meerendonk N; Chwilla DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):967-82. PubMed ID: 18199460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: the role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery.
    Kidd E; Stewart AJ; Serratrice L
    J Child Lang; 2011 Jan; 38(1):222-34. PubMed ID: 20196901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of only on syntactic processing of "long" relative clause sentences.
    Liversedge SP; Paterson KB; Clayes EL
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):225-40. PubMed ID: 11873848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: evidence from ERPs.
    Ye Z; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1203():103-15. PubMed ID: 18313650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.
    Fiebach CJ; Vos SH; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1562-75. PubMed ID: 15601519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Mason RA; Just MA; Keller TA; Carpenter PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1319-38. PubMed ID: 14622064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating the True Cost of Garden Pathing: A Computational Model of Latent Cognitive Processes.
    Paape D; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Aug; 46(8):e13186. PubMed ID: 35986666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: evidence for delay.
    Stewart AJ; Holler J; Kidd E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1680-96. PubMed ID: 17853228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Younger and Older Adults' "Good-Enough" Interpretations of Garden-Path Sentences.
    Christianson K; Williams CC; Zacks RT; Ferreira F
    Discourse Process; 2006; 42(2):205-238. PubMed ID: 17203135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lingering misinterpretations in garden-path sentences: evidence from a paraphrasing task.
    Patson ND; Darowski ES; Moon N; Ferreira F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 19210099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sentence-based mental simulations: Evidence from behavioral experiments using garden-path sentences.
    Schütt E; Dudschig C; Bergen BK; Kaup B
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):952-965. PubMed ID: 36307639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension.
    Thothathiri M; Snedeker J
    Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 18258226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.