These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11369408)

  • 1. Contributions of object- and space-based mechanisms to line bisection errors.
    Post RB; Caufield KJ; Welch RB
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(8):856-64. PubMed ID: 11369408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ineffective leftward search in line bisection and mechanisms of left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Gono S
    J Neurol; 1996 May; 243(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 8741077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Horizontal line bisections in upper and lower body space.
    Barrett AM; Crosson JB; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2000 May; 6(4):455-9. PubMed ID: 10902414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection.
    Arduino LS; Previtali P; Girelli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2140-6. PubMed ID: 20385154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.
    Rinaldi L; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Maravita A; Girelli L; Brugger P
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():34-44. PubMed ID: 29428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict and integration of spatial attention between disconnected hemispheres.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Furuya T
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2001 Oct; 71(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 11561029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the right superior temporal gyrus in stimulus-centered spatial processing.
    Shah-Basak PP; Chen P; Caulfield K; Medina J; Hamilton RH
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():6-13. PubMed ID: 29578025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymmetrical distractibility of global and focal visuospatial attention during segmental and total compound line bisections.
    Mosquera DM; Lamb DG; Garcia AM; Rodriguez JA; Correa LN; Salazar L; Schwartz ZJ; Cohen RA; Falchook AD; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychology; 2018 Oct; 32(7):843-849. PubMed ID: 29985016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Furukawa T; Tsukagoshi H
    Brain; 1989 Dec; 112 ( Pt 6)():1485-502. PubMed ID: 2597992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The complex interaction of normal biases in line bisection.
    Kashmere JL; Kirk A
    Neurology; 1997 Sep; 49(3):887-9. PubMed ID: 9305363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finding centre: ocular and fMRI investigations of bisection and landmark task performance.
    Cavézian C; Valadao D; Hurwitz M; Saoud M; Danckert J
    Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 1437():89-103. PubMed ID: 22230669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection.
    Scarisbrick DJ; Tweedy JR; Kuslansky G
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(4):695-9. PubMed ID: 3658153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagonal spatial neglect.
    Mark VW; Heilman KM
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Sep; 65(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 9728947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual search pattern during the line quadrisection task in normal subjects.
    Lee BH; Jeong Y; Kang SJ; Baek MJ; Chin J; Adair JC; Na DL
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 14985896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?
    Drakul A; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):629-36. PubMed ID: 27226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.