These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1137009)
1. The scientist's duty to contribute to the formation of public policy. Schneller GH Am J Pharm Sci Support Public Health; 1975; 147(2):56-9. PubMed ID: 1137009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Science and government. Science and the candidates. Kirshenbaum SR; Mooney C; Otto SL; Chapman M; Dacey A; Holt R; Krauss L Science; 2008 Apr; 320(5873):182. PubMed ID: 18403695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The endangered species act: science, policy, and politics. Bean MJ Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():369-91. PubMed ID: 19432657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Science, politics and regulation. Burger EJ Fed Proc; 1973 Jan; 32(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 4684661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Congress settle the abortion issue? Segers MC Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A duty to science. Faulkner LC Fed Proc; 1978 Jul; 37(9):2211. PubMed ID: 658460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The politics of peanut butter. Anderson G State Legis; 2000 Jun; 26(6):22-3, 25. PubMed ID: 11936163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Science and government. Improving science and technology advice for Congress. Morgan MG; Houghton A; Gibbons JH Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):1999-2000. PubMed ID: 11557862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The independent 96th: reflecting reforms of the 1970s, mood of voters back home. Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Jun; 12(3):12-6, 18-9. PubMed ID: 10242530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The confidentiality of HIV-related information: responding to the resurgence of aggressive public health interventions in the AIDS epidemic. Doughty R Calif Law Rev; 1994 Jan; 82(1):111-84. PubMed ID: 11652741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion policy in the post-Webster age. Halva-Neubauer G Publius; 1990; 20(3):27-44. PubMed ID: 11656128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. science policy. Bush victory leaves scars--and concerns about funding. Mervis J Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5699):1110-3. PubMed ID: 15539568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. RU 486 and the politics of drug regulation in the United States and France. Kramnick RK Cornell Int Law J; 1992; 25():667-718. PubMed ID: 11656340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science. LaFollette MC J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. U.S. science policy. Memo to Congress: get better advice. Malakoff D Science; 2001 Jun; 292(5525):2229-30. PubMed ID: 11423626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The scientist's responsibility to the public. Brown WT Psychiatr Q; 1971; 45(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 5147545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US biotechnology: row over industry regulation. Beardsley T Nature; 1986 Jun; 321(6071):641. PubMed ID: 11653734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. State policy responses to the AIDS epidemic. Colby DC; Baker DG Publius; 1988; 18(3):113-30. PubMed ID: 11652548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. State AIDS policy making: perspectives of legislative health committee chairs. Backstrom C; Robins L AIDS Public Policy J; 1995-1996 Winter; 10(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 11654734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]