These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11370531)

  • 1. [Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].
    Michniewicz K; Oellinger J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 11370531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
    Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Staging of cervical carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.
    Janus CL; Mendelson DS; Moore S; Gendal ES; Dottino P; Brodman M
    Clin Imaging; 1989 Jun; 13(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 2766072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Cervical Cancer: An Agreement Study.
    Arribas S; Alcázar JL; Arraiza M; Benito A; Minguez JA; Jurado M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):867-73. PubMed ID: 27022170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
    Fischerová D; Cibula D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results.
    Oellinger JJ; Blohmer JU; Michniewicz K; Siewert C; Wust P; Gutberlet M; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 10721187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging of cervical pathology.
    Rezvani M; Shaaban A
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 52(1):94-111. PubMed ID: 19179863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
    Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
    Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of computed tomography (CT) scan in staging of cervical carcinoma.
    Prasad TV; Thulkar S; Hari S; Sharma DN; Kumar S
    Indian J Med Res; 2014 May; 139(5):714-9. PubMed ID: 25027081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of intravaginal ultrasound gel for local staging of cervical carcinoma on MRI.
    Atcı N; Özgür T; Öztürk F; Dolapçıoğlu KS
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1104-1107. PubMed ID: 27442344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and imaging findings in cervical cancer and their impact on FIGO and TNM staging - An analysis from the EMBRACE study.
    Knoth J; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Haie-Meder C; Fokdal L; Sturdza A; Hoskin P; Mahantshetty U; Segedin B; Bruheim K; Wiebe E; Rai B; Cooper R; van der Steen-Banasik E; van Limbergen E; Pieters BR; Sundset M; Tan LT; Nout RA; Tanderup K; Kirisits C; Nesvacil N; Lindegaard JC; Schmid MP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):136-141. PubMed ID: 32798000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of imaging features and diagnostic values of MRI, CT and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma staging.
    Yu L; Zhang HF; Jiang DW; Zhao DY; Liu H; Shen LM
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2018 Aug; 22(15):4784-4791. PubMed ID: 30070310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of cystoscopy and intravenous urography after magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma.
    Chung H; Ahn HS; Kim YS; Lee EJ; Ryu HS; Chang KH; Kim SJ
    Yonsei Med J; 2001 Oct; 42(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 11675681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carcinoma of the cervix: role of MR imaging.
    Chiang SH; Quek ST
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2003 Jul; 32(4):550-6. PubMed ID: 12968563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical tumors.
    Sahdev A
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Oct; 31(5):399-413. PubMed ID: 20974359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
    Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
    Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.