204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11370531)
1. [Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].
Michniewicz K; Oellinger J
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 11370531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Staging of cervical carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.
Janus CL; Mendelson DS; Moore S; Gendal ES; Dottino P; Brodman M
Clin Imaging; 1989 Jun; 13(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 2766072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Cervical Cancer: An Agreement Study.
Arribas S; Alcázar JL; Arraiza M; Benito A; Minguez JA; Jurado M
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):867-73. PubMed ID: 27022170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results.
Oellinger JJ; Blohmer JU; Michniewicz K; Siewert C; Wust P; Gutberlet M; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 10721187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging of cervical pathology.
Rezvani M; Shaaban A
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 52(1):94-111. PubMed ID: 19179863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of computed tomography (CT) scan in staging of cervical carcinoma.
Prasad TV; Thulkar S; Hari S; Sharma DN; Kumar S
Indian J Med Res; 2014 May; 139(5):714-9. PubMed ID: 25027081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of intravaginal ultrasound gel for local staging of cervical carcinoma on MRI.
Atcı N; Özgür T; Öztürk F; Dolapçıoğlu KS
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1104-1107. PubMed ID: 27442344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and imaging findings in cervical cancer and their impact on FIGO and TNM staging - An analysis from the EMBRACE study.
Knoth J; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Haie-Meder C; Fokdal L; Sturdza A; Hoskin P; Mahantshetty U; Segedin B; Bruheim K; Wiebe E; Rai B; Cooper R; van der Steen-Banasik E; van Limbergen E; Pieters BR; Sundset M; Tan LT; Nout RA; Tanderup K; Kirisits C; Nesvacil N; Lindegaard JC; Schmid MP
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):136-141. PubMed ID: 32798000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of imaging features and diagnostic values of MRI, CT and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma staging.
Yu L; Zhang HF; Jiang DW; Zhao DY; Liu H; Shen LM
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2018 Aug; 22(15):4784-4791. PubMed ID: 30070310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of cystoscopy and intravenous urography after magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma.
Chung H; Ahn HS; Kim YS; Lee EJ; Ryu HS; Chang KH; Kim SJ
Yonsei Med J; 2001 Oct; 42(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 11675681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carcinoma of the cervix: role of MR imaging.
Chiang SH; Quek ST
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2003 Jul; 32(4):550-6. PubMed ID: 12968563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical tumors.
Sahdev A
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Oct; 31(5):399-413. PubMed ID: 20974359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
