These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11370750)

  • 41. The prescription and relative outcomes of different materials used in general dental practice in the north west region of England to restore the primary dentition.
    Milsom KM; Tickle M; Blinkhorn A
    J Dent; 2002; 30(2-3):77-82. PubMed ID: 12381406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
    Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
    Alkhudhairy F
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth.
    Gilmour AS; Evans P; Addy LD
    Br Dent J; 2007 May; 202(12):E32. PubMed ID: 17510663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Current use of tooth-colored inlays, onlays, and direct-placement resins.
    Christensen GJ
    J Esthet Dent; 1998; 10(6):290-5. PubMed ID: 10321198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Factors affecting the amount of long-term restorative dental treatment provided to 100 patients by 20 dentists in 3 Adelaide private practices.
    Hawthorne WS; Smales RJ
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Aug; 41(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 8870281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Direct Posterior Restorations: A 13-Year Survey of Teaching Trends and Use of Materials.
    Zabrovsky A; Mahmoud R; Beyth N; Ben-Gal G
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):E273-E279. PubMed ID: 30216130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations.
    Eltahlah D; Lynch CD; Chadwick BL; Blum IR; Wilson NHF
    J Dent; 2018 May; 72():1-7. PubMed ID: 29522787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Placement and replacement of restorations by selected practitioners.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 2005 Jun; 50(2):81-9; quiz 127. PubMed ID: 16050086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided.
    Lubisich EB; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Pashova HI; Burton B;
    J Dent; 2011 Apr; 39(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 21256915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Geraldeli S; Rindal DB; Qvist V; Fellows JL; Kellum HP; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Jun; 143(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 22653939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Differences between reported and actual restored caries lesion depths: results from The Dental PBRN.
    Rindal DB; Gordan VV; Fellows JL; Spurlock NL; Bauer MR; Litaker MS; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 22245444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Use of Restorative Materials in Primary Molars among Pediatric Dentists in Israel.
    Blumer S; Peretz B; Ratson T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(6):424-428. PubMed ID: 28937890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Changes in dentists' attitudes and practice in paediatric dentistry.
    Roshan D; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 12870984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in posterior teeth of young Finnish adults.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Dec; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 12512880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Advanced adhesive restorations: the post-amalgam age.
    Lutz FU; Krejci I; Oddera M
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 May; 8(4):385-94; quiz 398. PubMed ID: 9028299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.