These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11371320)

  • 21. Plain radiograph assessment of spinal hardware.
    Venu V; Vertinsky AT; Malfair D; Chew JB; Shewchuk J; Heran MK; Graeb DA; Street JT
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2011 Apr; 15(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 21500135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Managing postoperative artifacts on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Buckwalter KA; Lin C; Ford JM
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2011 Sep; 15(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 21928156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion. A comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences.
    Rudisch A; Kremser C; Peer S; Kathrein A; Judmaier W; Daniaux H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 9549791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inter- and intraobserver variability in the postoperative evaluation of transpedicular stabilization: computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.
    Tohtz SW; Rogalla P; Taupitz M; Perka C; Winkler T; Putzier M
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 20171934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Internal fixation of the spine using a braided titanium cable: clinical results and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
    Doran SE; Papadopoulos SM; Miller LD
    Neurosurgery; 1996 Mar; 38(3):493-6; discussion 496-7. PubMed ID: 8837801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Principles and imaging of spinal instrumentation.
    Slone RM; McEnery KW; Bridwell KH; Montgomery WJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Mar; 33(2):189-211. PubMed ID: 7871166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Vaccaro AR; Chesnut RM; Scuderi G; Healy JF; Massie JB; Garfin SR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jun; 19(11):1237-42. PubMed ID: 8073315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium.
    Knott PT; Mardjetko SM; Kim RH; Cotter TM; Dunn MM; Patel ST; Spencer MJ; Wilson AS; Tager DS
    Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):789-94. PubMed ID: 20619749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation.
    Wang JC; Yu WD; Sandhu HS; Tam V; Delamarter RB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Aug; 23(15):1684-8. PubMed ID: 9704376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MR imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopaedic hardware: techniques to minimize susceptibility artefact.
    Eustace S; Goldberg R; Williamson D; Melhem ER; Oladipo O; Yucel EK; Jara H
    Clin Radiol; 1997 Aug; 52(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 9285418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications.
    Olsen RV; Munk PL; Lee MJ; Janzen DL; MacKay AL; Xiang QS; Masri B
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(3):699-712. PubMed ID: 10835123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques.
    Tartaglino LM; Flanders AE; Vinitski S; Friedman DP
    Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):565-9. PubMed ID: 8284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implantable spinal fusion stimulator: assessment of MR safety and artifacts.
    Shellock FG; Hatfield M; Simon BJ; Block S; Wamboldt J; Starewicz PM; Punchard WF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Aug; 12(2):214-23. PubMed ID: 10931583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imaging the postoperative spine.
    Thakkar RS; Malloy JP; Thakkar SC; Carrino JA; Khanna AJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2012 Jul; 50(4):731-47. PubMed ID: 22643393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimizing imaging techniques in the postoperative patient.
    Buckwalter KA
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2007 Sep; 11(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 18260036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. MR Imaging with Metal-suppression Sequences for Evaluation of Total Joint Arthroplasty.
    Talbot BS; Weinberg EP
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 26587889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS ON T2*-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE CANINE AND FELINE SPINE.
    Hammond LJ; Hecht S
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(4):398-406. PubMed ID: 25693447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI.
    Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):703-6. PubMed ID: 23290476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of monoenergetic imaging to reduce metallic instrumentation artifacts in computed tomography of the cervical spine.
    Komlosi P; Grady D; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Goode AR; Judy PG; Shaffrey M; Wintermark M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25380537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Imaging of current spinal hardware: lumbar spine.
    Ha AS; Petscavage-Thomas JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):573-81. PubMed ID: 25148159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.