138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11371956)
1. Sigmoid cystoplasty with argon beam without mucosa.
De Badiola F; Ruiz E; Puigdevall J; Lobos P; Moldes J; Lopez Raffo M; Gallo A
J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 2):2253-5. PubMed ID: 11371956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urodynamic comparison of ileum vs. sigmoid in augmentation cystoplasty for neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
Radomski SB; Herschorn S; Stone AR
Neurourol Urodyn; 1995; 14(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 7647805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of urodynamics and continence in bladder augmentations with sigmoids].
Tuduri I; Fernández-Hurtado MA; Barrero R; Morcillo J; García-Merino F
Cir Pediatr; 2011 Jan; 24(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 23155647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome of augmentation sigmoidocystoplasty in children with neurogenic bladder.
Arikan N; Türkölmez K; Budak M; Gögüş O
Urol Int; 2000; 64(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 10810269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Urodynamic changes after bladder augmentation surgery in paediatric patients with myelomeningocele due to neurogenic bladder].
Zaragoza Torres RI; Galarza-Flores ME; Gómez-Castellanos JC; Barrera-de León JC
Cir Cir; 2016; 84(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 26707251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single distal ureter for ureterocystoplasty: a safe first choice tissue for bladder augmentation.
Pascual LA; Sentagne LM; Vega-Perugorría JM; de Badiola FI; Puigdevall JC; Ruiz E
J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 2):2256-8. PubMed ID: 11371957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urodynamic and imaging findings in infants with myelomeningocele may predict need for future augmentation cystoplasty.
Corona LE; Lee T; Marchetti K; S Streur C; Ivancic V; Kraft KH; Bloom DA; Wan J; Park JM
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):644.e1-644.e5. PubMed ID: 31653462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Outcomes of Bladder Neck Reconstruction without Augmentation Cystoplasty in Children.
Grimsby GM; Menon V; Schlomer BJ; Baker LA; Adams R; Gargollo PC; Jacobs MA
J Urol; 2016 Jan; 195(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 26173106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tissue engineered cystoplasty augmentation for treatment of neurogenic bladder using small intestinal submucosa: an exploratory study.
Zhang F; Liao L
J Urol; 2014 Aug; 192(2):544-50. PubMed ID: 24681330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intestinocystoplasty and total bladder replacement in children and young adults: followup in 129 cases.
Mitchell ME; Piser JA
J Urol; 1987 Sep; 138(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 3625861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bladder augmentation techniques in women.
Niknejad KG; Atala A
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2000 Jun; 11(3):156-69. PubMed ID: 11484743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of intestinal segment and configuration on the outcome of augmentation enterocystoplasty.
Sidi AA; Reinberg Y; Gonzalez R
J Urol; 1986 Dec; 136(6):1201-4. PubMed ID: 3773089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonsecretory sigmoid cystoplasty: experimental and clinical results.
Lima SV; Araújo LA; Vilar FO; Kummer CL; Lima EC
J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1651-4. PubMed ID: 7715000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is long-term bladder deterioration inevitable following successful isolated bladder outlet procedures in children with neuropathic bladder dysfunction?
Dave S; Pippi Salle JL; Lorenzo AJ; Braga LH; Peralta-Del Valle MH; Bägli D; Khoury AE
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1991-6; discussion 1996. PubMed ID: 18355848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonsecretory intestinocystoplasty: a 10-year experience.
Lima SV; Araújo LA; Vilar FO
J Urol; 2004 Jun; 171(6 Pt 2):2636-39; discussion 2639-40. PubMed ID: 15118439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term follow-up of sigmoid bladder augmentation for low-compliance neurogenic bladder.
Zhang P; Yang Y; Wu ZJ; Zhang N; Zhang CH; Zhang XD
Urology; 2014 Sep; 84(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 25168554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term followup of patients after redo bladder neck reconstruction for bladder exstrophy complex.
Burki T; Hamid R; Duffy P; Ransley P; Wilcox D; Mushtaq I
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1138-41; discussion 1141-2. PubMed ID: 16890709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative techniques for augmentation cystoplasty.
Duel BP; Gonzalez R; Barthold JS
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):998-1005. PubMed ID: 9474216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and Complications of Augmentation Cystoplasty with or without Nonrefluxing Ureteral Reimplantation in Patients with Bladder Dysfunction: A Single Center 11-Year Experience.
Wang Z; Liao L
J Urol; 2018 Jan; 199(1):200-205. PubMed ID: 28743527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bladder augmentation and artificial sphincter implantation: urodynamic behavior and effects on continence.
Rodó JS; Cáceres FA; Lerena JR; Rossy E
J Pediatr Urol; 2008 Feb; 4(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 18631885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
