These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11372097)

  • 1. Randomized selection of bitewing radiographs: analysis and clinical management thereof [corrected].
    Pillai K; Hollist NO
    Odontostomatol Trop; 1999 Mar; 22(85):11-4. PubMed ID: 11372097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental caries on adjacent approximal tooth surfaces in relation to order of eruption.
    Edward S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jan; 55(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9083572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approximal caries diagnosis in epidemiological studies: transillumination or bitewing radiographs?
    Obry-Musset AM; Cahen PM; Turlot JC; Frank RM
    J Biol Buccale; 1988 Mar; 16(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 3165088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of pit and fissure caries and caries experience as selection criteria in bitewing examinations for children.
    Kronmiller JE; Nirschl RF; Zullo TG
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1986; 53(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 3458731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of hidden caries.
    Weerheijm KL; Gruythuysen RJ; van Amerongen WE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1992; 59(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 1491078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 2. Evaluation of the size of approximal lesions and need for treatment.
    Weiss EI; Tzohar A; Kaffe I; Littner MM; Gelernter I; Eli I
    J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):385-8. PubMed ID: 8990681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enamel cracks. The role of enamel lamellae in caries initiation.
    Walker BN; Makinson OF; Peters MC
    Aust Dent J; 1998 Apr; 43(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 9612985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of cermet tunnel restorations on primary molars.
    Zenkner JE; Baratieri LN; Monteiro SJ; de Andrada MA; Vieira LC
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):783-91. PubMed ID: 20830891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of intra-examiner reproducibility in scoring caries in primary teeth of two scoring systems used to monitor caries progression.
    Solanki GC; Sheiham A
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1992 Apr; 20(2):57-9. PubMed ID: 1555388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries: effect of X-ray beam factors on diagnosis.
    Ricketts D; Kidd E; Smith B; Wilson R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 8603138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A performance measurement plan for pediatric dentists: using accuracy of caries diagnosis from intraoral radiographs.
    Ohiomoba HO; Nelson LP
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 23635892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alveolar bone height in primary dentition a radiographic evaluation related to caries lesions.
    Tarmahomed Sallé SN; Boessio Vizzotto M; Dias Silveira HE; Kuchenbecker Rösing C; Moreira Pitoni C; Borba de Araujo F
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Mar; 13(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 22455532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of the need for bitewing radiography in detecting caries in the primary dentition.
    Roeters FJ; Verdonschot EH; Bronkhorst EM; van 't Hof MA
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Dec; 22(6):456-60. PubMed ID: 7882663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 1. Evaluation of the presence of approximal lesions.
    Eli I; Weiss EI; Tzohar A; Littner MM; Gelernter I; Kaffe I
    J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 8990680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study of caries using axial-mesial-distal sections and interproximal and periapical radiographs with paralleling and bisecting technics].
    Ferreira ET; Matson E; de Oliveira JX; de Freitas A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 2135428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic versus clinical extension of Class II carious lesions using an F-speed film.
    Kooistra S; Dennison JB; Yaman P; Burt BA; Taylor GW
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 16382594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosis of approximal caries in primary teeth: radiographic versus clinical examination using tooth separation.
    de Araujo FB; de Araujo DR; dos Santos CK; de Souza MA
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):54-6. PubMed ID: 9522685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.