BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11372465)

  • 1. Morphometric testing of structural hypotheses of the supraorbital region in modern humans.
    Vinyard CJ; Smith FH
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 2001; 83(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 11372465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masticatory-stress hypotheses and the supraorbital region of primates.
    Hylander WL; Picq PG; Johnson KR
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Sep; 86(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 1951658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphological relationship between the cranial and supraorbital regions in Homo sapiens.
    Nowaczewska W; Kuźmiński Ł; Biecek P
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2015 Jan; 156(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 25284701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation and causal factors of craniofacial robusticity in Patagonian hunter-gatherers from the late Holocene.
    Bernal V; Perez SI; Gonzalez PN
    Am J Hum Biol; 2006; 18(6):748-65. PubMed ID: 17039466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonrandom factors in modern human morphological diversification: a study of craniofacial variation in southern South american populations.
    Perez SI; Monteiro LR
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):978-93. PubMed ID: 19055678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Craniofacial evolution in Polynesia: a geometric morphometric study of population diversity.
    Buck T; Viđarsdóttir US
    Am J Hum Biol; 2012; 24(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 22987741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patterns of cranial shape variation in the Papionini (Primates: Cercopithecinae).
    Singleton M
    J Hum Evol; 2002 May; 42(5):547-78. PubMed ID: 11969297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing hypotheses about tinkering in the fossil record: the case of the human skull.
    Lieberman DE; Krovitz GE; McBratney-Owen B
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2004 May; 302(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 15211687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo function of the craniofacial haft: the interorbital "pillar".
    Ross CF
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2001 Oct; 116(2):108-39. PubMed ID: 11590585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of cortical elastic properties in the craniofacial skeletons of three primate species and its relevance to the study of human evolution.
    Wang Q; Strait DS; Dechow PC
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Oct; 51(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 16905178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomical descriptions, comparative studies and evolutionary significance of the hominin skulls from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia.
    Rightmire GP; Lordkipanidze D; Vekua A
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Feb; 50(2):115-41. PubMed ID: 16271745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geometric morphometric study of the regional variation of modern human craniofacial form.
    Hennessy RJ; Stringer CB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 Jan; 117(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 11748561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relative efficacy of functional and developmental cranial modules for reconstructing global human population history.
    von Cramon-Taubadel N
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2011 Sep; 146(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 21710659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation among early North American crania.
    Jantz RL; Owsley DW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2001 Feb; 114(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 11169904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of size variation on univariate assessments of morphological difference in human crania.
    Hardy VC; Van Gerven DP
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1976 Jan; 44(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 1247115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Another look at shape variation in the distal femur of Australopithecus afarensis: implications for taxonomic and functional diversity at Hadar.
    Lague MR
    J Hum Evol; 2002 May; 42(5):609-26. PubMed ID: 11969299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Craniofacial variation in Homo habilis: an analysis of the evidence for multiple species.
    Miller JM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2000 May; 112(1):103-28. PubMed ID: 10766947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship of cranial, orbital and nasal cavity size with the morphology of the supraorbital region in modern
    Nowaczewska W; Łapicka U; Cieślik A; Biecek P
    Anthropol Anz; 2017 Sep; 74(3):241-246. PubMed ID: 28765870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Craniofacial morphology in the Argentine Center-West: consequences of the transition to food production.
    Sardi ML; Novellino PS; Pucciarelli HM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Jul; 130(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 16421925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endo's stress analysis of the primate skull and the functional significance of the supraorbital region.
    Picq PG; Hylander WL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Jul; 79(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 2669503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.