BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11372477)

  • 1. Failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Ravencraft v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America.
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(2):70-1. PubMed ID: 11372477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-Term Disability Plan Administration. Melech v. Life Insurance Company of North America, 739 F.3d 663, 57 EBC 1800 (11th Cir. 2014).
    Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 26540945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits Claim Statute of Limitations. Riley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 744 F.3d 241, 57 EBC 2153 (1st Cir. 2014).
    Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):68. PubMed ID: 26540946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review of Disability Claim. Hoffman v. Screen Actors Guild--Producers Pension Plan,_Fed. Appx._, 2014 WL 1664400 (9th Cir. 2014).
    Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):71. PubMed ID: 26540949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statute of Limitations in LTD Termination Appeal. Gordon v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP Group Long-Term Disability Plan, 2014 WL 1394962 (9th Cir. 2014).
    Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 26540948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discretion to Deny Benefits. Prezioso v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, 2014 WL 1356862 (8th Cir. 2014).
    Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 26540947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits. Final rule.
    Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor
    Fed Regist; 2016 Dec; 81(243):92316-43. PubMed ID: 28030889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of delegation on standard of review. Geddes v. United Staffing, 469 F.3d 919 (10th Cir. 2006).
    Benefits Q; 2009; 25(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 19408446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent developments in health insurance, life insurance, and disability insurance case law.
    Hasman JJ; Chittenden WA; Doolin EG
    Tort Insur Law J; 2002; 37(2):471-520. PubMed ID: 11917929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threat to cut off retiree's health insurance constitutes wrongful retaliation under ERISA ... Stiltner v. Beretta Corp.
    Margolis RE
    Healthspan; 1995 Feb; 12(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 10184679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health benefits--reimbursement--state law claim not preempted. Providence Health Plan v. McDowell.
    Benefits Q; 2006; 22(4):74-5. PubMed ID: 17286057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERISA attorney fees--denial of claim for partial disability benefits--westinghouse factors--abuse of discretion--excessive fee request. Willcox v. Liberty Life Assur. Co., 368 Fed. Appx. 700, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 6248 (8th cir., 2010).
    Benefits Q; 2011; 27(2):47. PubMed ID: 21513226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERISA preemption: will the elimination of the ERISA preemption clause help or harm America's ability to deal with its pending health care crisis?
    Taylor DH
    J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):133-78. PubMed ID: 11187365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disability discrimination and Parker v. Metropolitan Life: separate, but equal?
    Wall BW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 9554716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fortier v. Principal Life, 666 F3d 231 (4th Cir. 2012).
    Benefits Q; 2013; 29(1):71-2. PubMed ID: 23488090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc.: liability of utilization review companies in light of ERISA.
    Mellette PM; Kurtz JE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1993 May; 26(5):129-32, 160. PubMed ID: 10183895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fraud and fiduciary liability.
    Hodge BR
    Empl Benefits J; 2003 Dec; 28(4):53-61. PubMed ID: 14712737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
    Bloche MG
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health plans--e-mail benefits denial--exhaustion of administrative remedies. Maniscalco v. TAC Americas Comprehensive Healthcare Plan.
    Benefits Q; 2006; 22(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 16827545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent developments in health insurance, life insurance, and disability insurance case law.
    Hasman JJ; Chittenden WA; Doolin EG; Wall JF
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2008; 43(3):473-517. PubMed ID: 18828249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.