These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11372565)
1. Social facilitation as a function of the mere presence of others. Platania J; Moran GP J Soc Psychol; 2001 Apr; 141(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 11372565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The combination of perception of other individuals and exogenous manipulation of arousal enhances social facilitation as an aftereffect: re-examination of Zajonc's drive theory. Ukezono M; Nakashima SF; Sudo R; Yamazaki A; Takano Y Front Psychol; 2015; 6():601. PubMed ID: 25999906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Working alone or in the presence of others: exploring social facilitation in baggage X-ray security screening tasks. Yu RF; Wu X Ergonomics; 2015; 58(6):857-65. PubMed ID: 25554925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer pressure to "Fat talk": Does audience type influence how women portray their body image? Craig AB; Martz DM; Bazzini DG Eat Behav; 2007 Apr; 8(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17336794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of an audience on learning and performance of a complex motor skill. Martens R J Pers Soc Psychol; 1969 Jul; 12(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 5803833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Winkielman P; Cacioppo JT J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Dec; 81(6):989-1000. PubMed ID: 11761320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses. Lipp OV; Siddle DA; Dall PJ Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):452-61. PubMed ID: 9643060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Social facilitation of eating among friends and strangers. Clendenen VI; Herman CP; Polivy J Appetite; 1994 Aug; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7826053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Social "facilitation" as challenge and threat. Blascovich J; Mendes WB; Hunter SB; Salomon K J Pers Soc Psychol; 1999 Jul; 77(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 10434409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of the mere presence of coactors on learning a motor skill. Burwitz L; Newell KM J Mot Behav; 1972 Jun; 4(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 23952557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Social facilitation during the initial stage of motor learning: a re-examination of Martens' audience study. Landers DM; Bauer RS; Feltz DL J Mot Behav; 1978 Dec; 10(4):325-37. PubMed ID: 15186994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Social facilitation in young toddlers. Wanshaffe KR Psychol Rep; 2002 Feb; 90(1):349-50. PubMed ID: 11899008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Inhibitive effects of observer's presence on the choice latency]. Miyamoto M Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1987 Oct; 58(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 3450914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Social presence effects in the Stroop task: further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Huguet P; Galvaing MP; Monteil JM; Dumas F J Pers Soc Psychol; 1999 Nov; 77(5):1011-25. PubMed ID: 10573878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Social facilitation influences on the oral reading performance of academically handicapped children. Gottlieb BW Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Sep; 87(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 7124826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. Bond CF; Titus LJ Psychol Bull; 1983 Sep; 94(2):265-92. PubMed ID: 6356198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of failure and the nature of the audience on performance of a complex motor task. Lombardo JP; Catalano JF J Mot Behav; 1975 Mar; 7(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 23961888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An electromyographic study of social facilitation: a test of the 'mere presence' hypothesis. Chapman AJ Br J Psychol; 1974 Feb; 65(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 4822768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Drive level and the audience effect: a test of Zajonc's theory. Quarter J; Marcus A J Soc Psychol; 1971 Feb; 83(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 5100008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. Cottrell NB; Wack DL; Sekerak GJ; Rittle RH J Pers Soc Psychol; 1968 Jul; 9(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 5666972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]