BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11373675)

  • 21. Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faults.
    McGuire JJ; Boettcher MS; Jordan TH
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):457-61. PubMed ID: 15791246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Earthquake rupture dynamics frozen in exhumed ancient faults.
    Di Toro G; Nielsen S; Pennacchioni G
    Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7053):1009-12. PubMed ID: 16107846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhanced remote earthquake triggering at fluid-injection sites in the midwestern United States.
    van der Elst NJ; Savage HM; Keranen KM; Abers GA
    Science; 2013 Jul; 341(6142):164-7. PubMed ID: 23846900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Near-field investigations of the landers earthquake sequence, april to july 1992.
    Sieh K; Jones L; Hauksson E; Hudnut K; Eberhart-Phillips D; Heaton T; Hough S; Hutton K; Kanamori H; Lilje A; Lindvall S; McGill SF; Mori J; Rubin C; Spotila JA; Stock J; Thio HK; Treiman J; Wernicke B; Zachariasen J
    Science; 1993 Apr; 260(5105):171-6. PubMed ID: 17807175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Resolving Fine-Scale Heterogeneity of Co-seismic Slip and the Relation to Fault Structure.
    Milliner CW; Sammis C; Allam AA; Dolan JF; Hollingsworth J; Leprince S; Ayoub F
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27201. PubMed ID: 27256901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scale dependence in earthquake phenomena and its relevance to earthquake prediction.
    Aki K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3740-7. PubMed ID: 11607659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Post-earthquake ground movements correlated to pore-pressure transients.
    Jónsson S; Segall P; Pedersen R; Björnsson G
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):179-83. PubMed ID: 12853953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Space geodetic evidence for rapid strain rates in the New Madrid seismic zone of central USA.
    Smalley R; Ellis MA; Paul J; Van Arsdale RB
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1088-90. PubMed ID: 15973405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the loma prieta earthquake.
    Reasenberg PA; Simpson RW
    Science; 1992 Mar; 255(5052):1687-90. PubMed ID: 17749422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A great earthquake doublet and seismic stress transfer cycle in the central Kuril islands.
    Ammon CJ; Kanamori H; Lay T
    Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7178):561-5. PubMed ID: 18235499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Periodically triggered seismicity at Mount Wrangell, Alaska, after the Sumatra earthquake.
    West M; Sánchez JJ; McNutt SR
    Science; 2005 May; 308(5725):1144-6. PubMed ID: 15905395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The deterministic nature of earthquake rupture.
    Olson EL; Allen RM
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):212-5. PubMed ID: 16281033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Remote triggering of fault-strength changes on the San Andreas fault at Parkfield.
    Taira T; Silver PG; Niu F; Nadeau RM
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):636-9. PubMed ID: 19794490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Seismic hazard in the Marmara Sea region following the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake.
    Hubert-Ferrari A; Barka A; Jacques E; Nalbant SS; Meyer B; Armijo R; Tapponnier P; King GC
    Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6775):269-73. PubMed ID: 10749206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial and temporal seismic velocity changes on Kyushu Island during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake.
    Nimiya H; Ikeda T; Tsuji T
    Sci Adv; 2017 Nov; 3(11):e1700813. PubMed ID: 29202026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures.
    Wesnousky SG
    Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7117):358-60. PubMed ID: 17108963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The 1985 central chile earthquake: a repeat of previous great earthquakes in the region?
    Comte D; Eisenberg A; Lorca E; Pardo M; Ponce L; Saragoni R; Singh SK; Suárez G
    Science; 1986 Jul; 233(4762):449-53. PubMed ID: 17794569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stress triggering of the 1994 m = 6.7 northridge, california, earthquake by its predecessors.
    Stein RS; King GC; Lin J
    Science; 1994 Sep; 265(5177):1432-5. PubMed ID: 17833817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fault interactions and large complex earthquakes in the Los Angeles area.
    Anderson G; Aagaard B; Hudnut K
    Science; 2003 Dec; 302(5652):1946-9. PubMed ID: 14671298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Change in failure stress on the southern san andreas fault system caused by the 1992 magnitude = 7.4 landers earthquake.
    Stein RS; King GC; Lin J
    Science; 1992 Nov; 258(5086):1328-32. PubMed ID: 17778356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.