206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11375582)
1. Reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of cleaning, function, adequacy of tissue specimen, and durability.
Kozarek RA; Attia FM; Sumida SE; Raltz SL; Roach SK; Schembre DB; Brandabur JJ; Ball TJ; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Patterson DJ; Bredfeldt JE; Gelfand M; McCormick SE; Drajpuch DB; Moran DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jun; 53(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 11375582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Brandabur JJ; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ; Gluck MG; Sumida SE; Roach SK; Drajpuch DE; Irizarry DL
Endoscopy; 2001 May; 33(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 11396756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?
Fireman Z
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16824057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reusable biopsy forceps: a cost-effective measure for the endoscopy suite.
Raltz SL; Kozarek RA; Pethigal PA; Moorhouse MA; Merriam LD
Gastroenterol Nurs; 1995; 18(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 7578296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study.
Jung M; Beilenhoff U; Pietsch M; Kraft B; Rippin G
Endoscopy; 2003 Mar; 35(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 12584636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.
Yang R; Ng S; Nichol M; Laine L
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 10699769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodology of reprocessing reusable accessories.
Alfa MJ
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):361-78. PubMed ID: 10683221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Manual methods are suboptimal compared with automated methods for cleaning of single-use biopsy forceps.
Alfa MJ; Nemes R; Olson N; Mulaire A
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 27(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 16874645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial.
Rizzo J; Bernstein D; Gress F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10699767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: comparison with standard forceps of sample size and adequacy of specimen.
Turk DJ; Kozarek RA; Botoman VA; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ
J Clin Gastroenterol; 1991 Feb; 13(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 2007750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of contamination of sterile biopsy forceps in disinfected endoscopes.
Lee RM; Kozarek RA; Sumida SE; Raltz SL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 May; 47(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 9609430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. GI endoscopic reprocessing practices in the United States.
Cheung RJ; Ortiz D; DiMarino AJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Sep; 50(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 10462657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surveillance cultures to monitor quality of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing.
Moses FM; Lee J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jan; 98(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 12526940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?
Muscarella LF
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001; 24(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11847729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of sterilization of reusable endoscopic biopsy forceps by autoclaving and ethylene oxide gas.
Yoon JH; Yoon BC; Lee HL; Lee JK; Kim YT; Lee DH; Choi IJ; Lee DH; Kim DH
Dig Dis Sci; 2012 Feb; 57(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 21904859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps for colorectal epithelial cell proliferation in humans.
Sandler RS; Cummings MS; Keku TO; Terse A; Mehta N
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Oct; 9(10):1123-5. PubMed ID: 11045798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decontaminated single-use devices: an oxymoron that may be placing patients at risk for cross-contamination.
Heeg P; Roth K; Reichl R; Cogdill CP; Bond WW
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):542-9. PubMed ID: 11732782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.
Deprez PH; Horsmans Y; Van Hassel M; Hoang P; Piessevaux H; Geubel A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 10699768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
