BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11376023)

  • 1. The prognosis in cervical epithelial changes of uncertain significance is similar to that of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1.
    Heatley MK
    J Clin Pathol; 2001 Jun; 54(6):474-5. PubMed ID: 11376023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
    al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
    J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
    Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. p16(INK4a) as a complementary marker of high-grade intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. I: Experience with squamous lesions in 189 consecutive cervical biopsies.
    Dray M; Russell P; Dalrymple C; Wallman N; Angus G; Leong A; Carter J; Cheerala B
    Pathology; 2005 Apr; 37(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 16028838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Progression of Precancerous Cervical Lesion Predicted by p16 Protein Immunohistochemistry in Rajavithi Hospital.
    Charoonwatana T; Boonlikit S; Yanaranop M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jun; 20(6):1809-1815. PubMed ID: 31244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Presence of koilocytosis in low-grade smears of high-risk HPV-positive women is a negative predictor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more.
    Siebers AG; van der Linden H; Vedder JEM; Bekkers RLM; Melchers WLG; Bulten J
    Cytopathology; 2018 Jun; 29(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 29575519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years.
    Sykes PH; Simcock BJ; Innes CR; Harker D; Williman JA; Whitehead M; van der Griend RA; Lawton BA; Hibma M; Fitzgerald P; Dudley NM; Petrich S; Eva L; Bergzoll C; Kathuria J; McPherson G; Tristram A; Faherty J; Hardie D; Robertson A; Robertson V; Pather S; Wrede CD; Gastrell F; Fentiman G; John M; White E; Parker C; Sadler L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):222.e1-222.e13. PubMed ID: 34534506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test.
    Kyrgiou M; Kalliala IE; Mitra A; Fotopoulou C; Ghaem-Maghami S; Martin-Hirsch PP; Cruickshank M; Arbyn M; Paraskevaidis E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jan; 1(1):CD009836. PubMed ID: 28125861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical dysplasia in adolescents.
    Wright JD; Davila RM; Pinto KR; Merritt DF; Gibb RK; Rader JS; Mutch DG; Gao F; Powell MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 15994625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aberrant Expression of the Cell Polarity Regulator aPKCλ/ι is Associated With Disease Progression in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN): A Possible Marker for Predicting CIN Prognosis.
    Mizushima T; Asai-Sato M; Akimoto K; Nagashima Y; Taguri M; Sasaki K; Nakaya MA; Asano R; Tokinaga A; Kiyono T; Hirahara F; Ohno S; Miyagi E
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2016 Mar; 35(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 26535980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
    Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
    Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
    Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. p16INK4A immunohistochemical staining and predictive value for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1: a prospective study in China.
    Liao GD; Sellors JW; Sun HK; Zhang X; Bao YP; Jeronimo J; Chen W; Zhao FH; Song Y; Cao Z; Zhang SK; Xi MR; Qiao YL
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Apr; 134(7):1715-24. PubMed ID: 24105727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrence of high-grade cervical abnormalities following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2.
    Wilkinson TM; Sykes PH; Simcock B; Petrich S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):769.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25582099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Angiogenesis in squamous precancerous cervical lesions].
    Panjković M; Ivković-Kapicl T
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2007 Jan; 64(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 17304718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MiRNA detection in cervical exfoliated cells for missed high-grade lesions in women with LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis after colposcopy-guided biopsy.
    Ye J; Cheng XD; Cheng B; Cheng YF; Chen XJ; Lu WG
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 30700264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Histologic classification and terminology of precancerous lesions of the cervix].
    Hadzić B; Hadzić M; Curcin N
    Med Pregl; 1999; 52(3-5):151-5. PubMed ID: 10518401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Follow-up study of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 overexpressing p16Ink4a.
    Cortecchia S; Galanti G; Sgadari C; Costa S; De Lillo M; Caprara L; Barillari G; Monini P; Nannini R; Ensoli B; Bucchi L
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1663-9. PubMed ID: 24172101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The significance of marked nuclear atypia in grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Fadare O; Rodriguez R
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Oct; 40(10):1487-93. PubMed ID: 19540559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Follow up in women with biopsy diagnosis of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL): how long should it be?
    Ciavattini A; Clemente N; Tsiroglou D; Sopracordevole F; Serri M; Delli Carpini G; Papiccio M; Cattani P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Apr; 295(4):997-1003. PubMed ID: 28255767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.