322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11376077)
21. [Self-collected and mailed samples for diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women].
Ostergaard LJ; Møller JK; Andersen B; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Aug; 159(34):5089-92. PubMed ID: 9297312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Use of transcription-based amplification and enzyme immunoassay methods to investigate possible Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women with genital complaints].
Bulut Y; Durmaz B; Durmaz R; Otlu B
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2002 Jan; 36(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 12476764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay (IDEIA) with tissue culture isolation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using a single swab.
Krech T; Gerhard-Fsadni D; Degen KW; Vossel R; Géraud GP
Microbiologica; 1989 Apr; 12(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 2664432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Rapid diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis using a DNA probe in a population with low risk of infection].
Rosales M; Domínguez V; Bonacho I; Vidal X
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1992 Feb; 10(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 1643131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime CT assay with the BD ProbeTec ET assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a clinical microbiology laboratory.
Walsh A; Rourke FO; Laoi BN; Crowley B
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 May; 64(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19362255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of multiple nucleic acid amplification tests to define the infected-patient "gold standard" in clinical trials of new diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Martin DH; Nsuami M; Schachter J; Hook EW; Ferrero D; Quinn TC; Gaydos C
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4749-58. PubMed ID: 15472336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection and predictive criteria among low-risk women in a primary care setting.
Tosun I; Cihanyurdu M; Kaklikkaya N; Topbas M; Aydin F; Erturk M
Jpn J Infect Dis; 2008 May; 61(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 18503174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of polymerase chain reaction on pooled cervical swabs to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female sex workers in Singapore.
Tan HH; Chan R
Singapore Med J; 2005 May; 46(5):215-8. PubMed ID: 15858689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of rapid enzyme immunoassay tests for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infections.
Ferris DG; Martin WH; Fischer PM; Petry LJ
J Fam Pract; 1990 Dec; 31(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 2246633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rapid diagnosis by immunofluorescence of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infections.
Del Pezzo M; Miloso M; Piccoli S; Gulletta E
G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1987; 80(1-12):183-8. PubMed ID: 3334312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of endocervical-specimen adequacy on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the APTIMA COMBO 2 assay.
Rogers CK; Wood BJ; Rizzo P; Gaydos CA
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 44(12):4564-5. PubMed ID: 17065266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multisite pooling study using ligase chain reaction in screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Clark AM; Steece R; Crouse K; Campbell J; Zanto S; Kartchner D; Mottice S; Pettit D
Sex Transm Dis; 2001 Oct; 28(10):565-8. PubMed ID: 11689754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Chlamydia trachomatis PCR (Cobas Amplicor) in women: endocervical specimen transported in a specimen of urine versus endocervical and urethral specimens in 2-SP medium versus urine specimen only.
Airell A; Ottosson L; Bygdeman SM; Carlberg H; Lidbrink P; Rudén AK; Elfgren K
Int J STD AIDS; 2000 Oct; 11(10):651-8. PubMed ID: 11057936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preference among female Army recruits for use of self-administrated vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections.
Hsieh YH; Howell MR; Gaydos JC; McKee KT; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA
Sex Transm Dis; 2003 Oct; 30(10):769-73. PubMed ID: 14520176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary medicine clinic attendees: comparison of strand displacement amplification and the ligase chain reaction.
McCartney RA; Walker J; Scoular A
Br J Biomed Sci; 2001; 58(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 11788000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pooling cervical swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR: sensitivity, dilution, inhibition, and cost-saving aspects.
Morré SA; van Dijk R; Meijer CJ; van den Brule AJ; Kjaer SK; Munk C
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):2375-6. PubMed ID: 11414248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pooling of clinical specimens prior to testing for Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR is accurate and cost saving.
Currie MJ; McNiven M; Yee T; Schiemer U; Bowden FJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4866-7. PubMed ID: 15472365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pooling cervical swabs and testing by ligase chain reaction are accurate and cost-saving strategies for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Kapala J; Copes D; Sproston A; Patel J; Jang D; Petrich A; Mahony J; Biers K; Chernesky M
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 38(7):2480-3. PubMed ID: 10878029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Screening for genital chlamydia infection: DNA amplification techniques should be the test of choice.
Harindra V; Underhill G; Tobin JM
Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Nov; 14(11):723-6. PubMed ID: 14624732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Moncada J; Schachter J; Shipp M; Bolan G; Wilber J
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Aug; 27(8):1863-6. PubMed ID: 2671035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
