199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11376267)
1. FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: standardized uptake value in 52 lesions.
Aoki J; Watanabe H; Shinozaki T; Takagishi K; Ishijima H; Oya N; Sato N; Inoue T; Endo K
Radiology; 2001 Jun; 219(3):774-7. PubMed ID: 11376267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FDG-PET for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue masses.
Aoki J; Watanabe H; Shinozaki T; Takagishi K; Tokunaga M; Koyama Y; Sato N; Endo K
Skeletal Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 12605276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical efficacy of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors.
Shin DS; Shon OJ; Han DS; Choi JH; Chun KA; Cho IH
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 22(7):603-9. PubMed ID: 18756363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overexpression of hexokinase-2 in giant cell tumor of bone is associated with false positive in bone tumor on FDG-PET/CT.
Hoshi M; Takada J; Oebisu N; Hata K; Ieguchi M; Nakamura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Nov; 132(11):1561-8. PubMed ID: 22825642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-time point PET/CT with F-18 FDG for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions.
Tian R; Su M; Tian Y; Li F; Li L; Kuang A; Zeng J
Skeletal Radiol; 2009 May; 38(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 19205695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative evaluation of skeletal tumours with dynamic FDG PET: SUV in comparison to Patlak analysis.
Wu H; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Heichel TO; Lehner B; Bernd L; Ewerbeck V; Burger C; Strauss LG
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Jun; 28(6):704-10. PubMed ID: 11440030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FDG-PET in differential diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcomas.
Aoki J; Watanabe H; Shinozaki T; Tokunaga M; Inoue T; Endo K
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 10433294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benign versus malignant intraosseous lesions: discrimination by means of PET with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.
Dehdashti F; Siegel BA; Griffeth LK; Fusselman MJ; Trask DD; McGuire AH; McGuire DJ
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 8657920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of quantitative (18)F-FDG PET studies for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Strauss LG; Heichel T; Wu H; Burger C; Bernd L; Ewerbeck V
J Nucl Med; 2002 Apr; 43(4):510-8. PubMed ID: 11937595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The additional value of CT images interpretation in the differential diagnosis of benign vs. malignant primary bone lesions with 18F-FDG-PET/CT.
Strobel K; Exner UE; Stumpe KD; Hany TF; Bode B; Mende K; Veit-Haibach P; von Schulthess GK; Hodler J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Nov; 35(11):2000-8. PubMed ID: 18712385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 11C-choline PET and FDG PET for the differential diagnosis of malignant tumors.
Tian M; Zhang H; Oriuchi N; Higuchi T; Endo K
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Aug; 31(8):1064-72. PubMed ID: 15014903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 18F-FDG accumulation with PET for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in the thorax.
Demura Y; Tsuchida T; Ishizaki T; Mizuno S; Totani Y; Ameshima S; Miyamori I; Sasaki M; Yonekura Y
J Nucl Med; 2003 Apr; 44(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 12679397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delayed (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scan for differentiation between malignant and benign lesions in the pancreas.
Nakamoto Y; Higashi T; Sakahara H; Tamaki N; Kogire M; Doi R; Hosotani R; Imamura M; Konishi J
Cancer; 2000 Dec; 89(12):2547-54. PubMed ID: 11135214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of FDG-PET in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant fractures in acute to subacute phase.
Kato K; Aoki J; Endo K
Ann Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 17(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12691129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography for evaluation of indeterminate lung nodules: assigning a probability of malignancy may be preferable to binary readings.
Kim SC; Machac J; Krynyckyi BR; Knesaurek K; Krellenstein D; Schultz B; Gribetz A; DePalo L; Teirstein A; Kim CK
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 22(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 18498030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 11C-choline PET for the detection of bone and soft tissue tumours in comparison with FDG PET.
Zhang H; Tian M; Oriuchi N; Higuchi T; Watanabe H; Aoki J; Tanada S; Endo K
Nucl Med Commun; 2003 Mar; 24(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 12612468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET.
Hickeson M; Yun M; Matthies A; Zhuang H; Adam LE; Lacorte L; Alavi A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Dec; 29(12):1639-47. PubMed ID: 12458399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of 18F-FDG uptake in various regions of Waldeyer's ring to differentiate benign from malignant lesions in the midline roof of the nasopharynx.
Chen YK; Wang SC; Cheng RH; Yeh CL; Tsui CC; Chia-Hung K
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Sep; 35(9):922-31. PubMed ID: 24781010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of F-18 FDG PET and 201Tl scintigraphy for detection of primary malignant bone and soft-tissue tumors.
Yamamoto Y; Kawaguchi Y; Kawase Y; Maeda Y; Nishiyama Y
Clin Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 36(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 21368603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carbon-11 choline positron emission tomography in musculoskeletal tumors: comparison with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Yanagawa T; Watanabe H; Inoue T; Ahmed AR; Tomiyoshi K; Shinozaki T; Oriuchi N; Endo K; Takagishi K
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2003; 27(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 12703009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
