These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11376639)
1. Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space. Gouteux S; Spelke ES Cognition; 2001 Sep; 81(2):119-48. PubMed ID: 11376639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Children's use of geometry for reorientation. Lee SA; Spelke ES Dev Sci; 2008 Sep; 11(5):743-9. PubMed ID: 18801130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reorientation and landmark-guided search by young children: evidence for two systems. Lee SA; Shusterman A; Spelke ES Psychol Sci; 2006 Jul; 17(7):577-82. PubMed ID: 16866742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: young children's use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task. Lee SA; Sovrano VA; Spelke ES Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):144-61. PubMed ID: 22257573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Hermer L; Spelke ES Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6484):57-9. PubMed ID: 8015605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Young children reorient by computing layout geometry, not by matching images of the environment. Lee SA; Spelke ES Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):192-8. PubMed ID: 21327347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Children's use of landmarks: implications for modularity theory. Learmonth AE; Nadel L; Newcombe NS Psychol Sci; 2002 Jul; 13(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 12137136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Young children's use of features to reorient is more than just associative: further evidence against a modular view of spatial processing. Newcombe NS; Ratliff KR; Shallcross WL; Twyman AD Dev Sci; 2010 Jan; 13(1):213-20. PubMed ID: 20121877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modular geometric mechanism for reorientation in children. Lee SA; Spelke ES Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):152-76. PubMed ID: 20570252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reorienting strategies in a rectangular array of landmarks by domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Pecchia T; Vallortigara G J Comp Psychol; 2010 May; 124(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 20476814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Children's use of geometric information in mapping tasks. Vasilyeva M; Bowers E J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Dec; 95(4):255-77. PubMed ID: 16777136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Young children's representation of geometric relationships between locations in location coding. Hu Q; Zhang M; Shao Y; Feng G J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jan; 189():104703. PubMed ID: 31655228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Navigable Space and Traversable Edges Differentially Influence Reorientation in Sighted and Blind Mice. Normandin ME; Garza MC; Ramos-Alvarez MM; Julian JB; Eresanara T; Punjaala N; Vasquez JH; Lopez MR; Muzzio IA Psychol Sci; 2022 Jun; 33(6):925-947. PubMed ID: 35536866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is height a core geometric cue for navigation? Young children's use of height in reorientation. Hu Q; Zhang J; Wu D; Shao Y J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Feb; 130():123-31. PubMed ID: 25462036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial reorientation by geometry with freestanding objects and extended surfaces: a unifying view. Pecchia T; Vallortigara G Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jun; 279(1736):2228-36. PubMed ID: 22237909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. Learmonth AE; Newcombe NS; Sheridan N; Jones M Dev Sci; 2008 May; 11(3):414-26. PubMed ID: 18466375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. Vallortigara G; Feruglio M; Sovrano VA Dev Sci; 2005 Sep; 8(5):393-401. PubMed ID: 16048511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does a row of objects comprise a boundary? How children miss the forest for the trees in spatial navigation. Mastrogiuseppe M; Gianni E; Lee SA Dev Psychol; 2023 Dec; 59(12):2397-2407. PubMed ID: 37824230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks. Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 19960217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geometry, landmarks and the cerebral hemispheres: 2D spatial reorientation in split-brain patients. Prete G; Fabri M; Foschi N; Tommasi L J Neuropsychol; 2018 Jun; 12(2):248-270. PubMed ID: 27958664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]