176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11377302)
1. Does nocturnal deactivation of the artificial urinary sphincter lessen the risk of urethral atrophy?
Elliott DS; Barrett DM; Gohma M; Boone TB
Urology; 2001 Jun; 57(6):1051-4. PubMed ID: 11377302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proof of concept: Exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter via assessment of circumferential recovery after capsulotomy and intraoperative pressure profiling of the pressure regulating balloon.
Pearlman AM; Rasper AM; Terlecki RP
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Jul; 59(4):275-279. PubMed ID: 29984343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined external urethral bulking and artificial urinary sphincter for urethral atrophy and stress urinary incontinence.
Rahman NU; Minor TX; Deng D; Lue TF
BJU Int; 2005 Apr; 95(6):824-6. PubMed ID: 15794791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proximal artificial sphincter cuff repositioning for urethral atrophy incontinence.
Couillard DR; Vapnek JM; Stone AR
Urology; 1995 Apr; 45(4):653-6. PubMed ID: 7716847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy.
Zheng DC; Xie MK; Bao JW; Yao HJ; Wang Z
J Vis Exp; 2022 Jun; (184):. PubMed ID: 35781527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence.
Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF
J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indications for revision of artificial urinary sphincter and modifiable risk factors for device-related morbidity.
Anusionwu II; Wright EJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Jan; 32(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 22693077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Risk Factors Associated With Urethral Atrophy.
Viers BR; Mathur S; Hofer MD; Dugi DD; Pagliara TJ; Singla N; Walker J; Scott JM; Morey AF
Urology; 2017 May; 103():230-233. PubMed ID: 27993713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of urethral atrophy after implantation of artificial urinary sphincter: what are the weaknesses?
Heah NH; Tan RBW
Asian J Androl; 2020; 22(1):60-63. PubMed ID: 31736473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence.
DiMarco DS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2003 Oct; 170(4 Pt 1):1252-4. PubMed ID: 14501735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision in Nonneurological Male Patients.
Bentellis I; El-Akri M; Cornu JN; Brierre T; Cousin T; Gaillard V; Dupuis H; Tricard T; Hermieu N; Bertrand-Leon P; Chevallier D; Bruyere F; Biardeau X; Hermieu JF; Lecoanet P; Capon G; Game X; Saussine C; Durand M; Peyronnet B
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1248-1257. PubMed ID: 34184925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is Risk of Artificial Urethral Sphincter Cuff Erosion Higher in Patients with Penile Prosthesis?
Sundaram V; Cordon BH; Hofer MD; Morey AF
J Sex Med; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1432-1437. PubMed ID: 27555513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter.
Raj GV; Peterson AC; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 15758761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Small intestinal submucosa urethral wrap at the time of artificial urinary sphincter placement as a salvage treatment option for patients with persistent/recurrent incontinence following multiple prior sphincter failures and erosions.
Trost L; Elliott D
Urology; 2012 Apr; 79(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22119252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of perioperative anticoagulation on artificial urinary sphincter device survival.
Blackburne AT; Linder BJ; Elliott DS
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):339-341. PubMed ID: 28580867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) Reactivation at the Time of Urethral Cuff Exchange is Not Associated with Increased Erosion Rate.
Rabinowitz MJ; Haney NM; Liu JL; Dani H; Cohen AJ; Wright EJ
Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():253-256. PubMed ID: 34343563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic challenges in the evaluation of persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in patients after prostatectomy.
Chung E; Cartmill R
BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112 Suppl 2():32-5. PubMed ID: 24127674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
