BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11377601)

  • 1. Changing rates of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix in England.
    Sasieni P; Adams J
    Lancet; 2001 May; 357(9267):1490-3. PubMed ID: 11377601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
    Sasieni P; Castanon A; Cuzick J
    Int J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 125(3):525-9. PubMed ID: 19449379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is cervical screening preventing adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix?
    Castanon A; Landy R; Sasieni PD
    Int J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 139(5):1040-5. PubMed ID: 27096255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study.
    de Sanjose S; Quint WG; Alemany L; Geraets DT; Klaustermeier JE; Lloveras B; Tous S; Felix A; Bravo LE; Shin HR; Vallejos CS; de Ruiz PA; Lima MA; Guimera N; Clavero O; Alejo M; Llombart-Bosch A; Cheng-Yang C; Tatti SA; Kasamatsu E; Iljazovic E; Odida M; Prado R; Seoud M; Grce M; Usubutun A; Jain A; Suarez GA; Lombardi LE; Banjo A; Menéndez C; Domingo EJ; Velasco J; Nessa A; Chichareon SC; Qiao YL; Lerma E; Garland SM; Sasagawa T; Ferrera A; Hammouda D; Mariani L; Pelayo A; Steiner I; Oliva E; Meijer CJ; Al-Jassar WF; Cruz E; Wright TC; Puras A; Llave CL; Tzardi M; Agorastos T; Garcia-Barriola V; Clavel C; Ordi J; Andújar M; Castellsagué X; Sánchez GI; Nowakowski AM; Bornstein J; Muñoz N; Bosch FX;
    Lancet Oncol; 2010 Nov; 11(11):1048-56. PubMed ID: 20952254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
    Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas.
    Vizcaino AP; Moreno V; Bosch FX; Muñoz N; Barros-Dios XM; Parkin DM
    Int J Cancer; 1998 Feb; 75(4):536-45. PubMed ID: 9466653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changing incidence of invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in East Anglia.
    Stockton D; Cooper P; Lonsdale RN
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9200062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in cancer of the cervix uteri in Sweden following cytological screening.
    Bergström R; Sparén P; Adami HO
    Br J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 81(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 10487628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries.
    Bray F; Carstensen B; Møller H; Zappa M; Zakelj MP; Lawrence G; Hakama M; Weiderpass E
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Sep; 14(9):2191-9. PubMed ID: 16172231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women.
    Liu S; Semenciw R; Mao Y
    CMAJ; 2001 Apr; 164(8):1151-2. PubMed ID: 11338801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cervical cancer in the young woman].
    Marie G; Barjot P; Crouet H; Mace-Lesech J; Dommesent D; Uzan M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(7):743-7. PubMed ID: 8308200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
    Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
    Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening.
    Bray F; Loos AH; McCarron P; Weiderpass E; Arbyn M; Møller H; Hakama M; Parkin DM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Mar; 14(3):677-86. PubMed ID: 15767349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri.
    Nieminen P; Kallio M; Hakama M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):1017-21. PubMed ID: 7770247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical cancer prevented by screening: Long-term incidence trends by morphology in Norway.
    Lönnberg S; Hansen BT; Haldorsen T; Campbell S; Schee K; Nygård M
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(7):1758-64. PubMed ID: 25833121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing the burden of glandular carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
    Herzog TJ; Monk BJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):566-71. PubMed ID: 18060938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraepithelial carcinoma of the cervix uteri in women aged under 35 years.
    Davies SW; Kelly RM
    Br Med J; 1971 Nov; 4(5786):525-6. PubMed ID: 5126956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of causes of increased incidence of cervical cancer in Slovenia.
    Smrkolj S; Rakar S; Mozina A; Erzen M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 15541860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The changing pattern of cervical cancer in Northern Ireland 1965-1989.
    Robertson JH; Woodend B
    Ulster Med J; 1992 Apr; 61(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 1621297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.