These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11377886)

  • 1. Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emission thresholds recorded conventionally and using maximum length sequences.
    Hine JE; Ho CT; Slaven A; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 156(1-2):104-14. PubMed ID: 11377886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences from patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):122-33. PubMed ID: 15855037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorder using maximum length sequences as a function of stimulus rate and level.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 9099561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.
    Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF; Blankenship CM; Garinis AC; Putterman DB; Wróblewski M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():117-139. PubMed ID: 30409510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation into the relationship between input-output nonlinearities and rate-induced nonlinearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences.
    Lineton B; Thornton AR; Baker VJ
    Hear Res; 2006 Sep; 219(1-2):24-35. PubMed ID: 16839721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neonatal otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequence stimuli.
    Slaven A; Thornton AR
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 9562532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does Contralateral Inhibition of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Suggest Sex or Ear Laterality Effects?
    Stuart A; Kerls AN
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):272-282. PubMed ID: 29946686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal nonlinearity revealed by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded to trains of multiple clicks.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):128-41. PubMed ID: 12031522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of olivocochlear bundle section on evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR; Brookes GB
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):28-36. PubMed ID: 9213119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Principal component analysis as a method to facilitate fast detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ravazzani P; Tognola G; Parazzini M; Grandori F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 12665039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emission measures to auditory thresholds.
    Balatsouras D; Kaberos A; Karapantzos E; Homsioglou E; Economou NC; Korres S
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 Feb; 10(2):MT24-30. PubMed ID: 14737052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of high stimulus rate auditory brainstem responses in the estimation of hearing threshold.
    Leung SM; Slaven A; Thornton AR; Brickley GJ
    Hear Res; 1998 Sep; 123(1-2):201-5. PubMed ID: 9745967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interaction between ear and sex differences and stimulus rate.
    Ismail H; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2003 May; 179(1-2):97-103. PubMed ID: 12742242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
    Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years.
    Ferguson MA; Smith PA; Davis AC; Lutman ME
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 10905398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.