These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11378226)

  • 21. [Test report on the system components for film processing by the middle-format technology].
    Furnell EC; Pohlenz O
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Dec; 38(12):392-6. PubMed ID: 4089483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computed radiography X-ray exposure trends.
    Seibert JA; Shelton DK; Moore EH
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 8796680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Point/Counterpoint. A major advantage of digital imaging for general radiography is the potential for reduced patient dose so film/screen systems should be phased out as unnecessarily hazardous.
    Vano E; Faulkner K; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1529-31. PubMed ID: 16872058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Clinical picture and diagnosis based on integrated images. Rational approach and medical results].
    Marano P
    Radiol Med; 1985 Mar; 71(3):105-9. PubMed ID: 3898239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality control of the automatic processor.
    Legg LM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Feb; 22(2):135-8, 140-2; quiz 144. PubMed ID: 11911065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The factors influencing the relative exposure of the radiological picture with doubly amplifying film as opposed to singly amplifying film (author's transl)].
    Meiler J
    Rontgenblatter; 1974 Jul; 27(7):368-74. PubMed ID: 4417112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of manual and automatic processing in general dental practice.
    Rout PG; Rogers SN; Chapman M; Rippin JW
    Br Dent J; 1996 Aug; 181(3):99-101. PubMed ID: 8810109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development].
    Buchberger W; Giacomuzzi SM; Springer P
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Low-silver and silver-free x-ray materials for medical diagnosis].
    Gusev EA; Luk'ianenko EA; Chelnokov VB
    Med Tekh; 1993; (2):33-7. PubMed ID: 8502154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Checking the consistency of sensitometers and film processors in a mammographic screening programme.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):143-7. PubMed ID: 8785642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Fundamental study on stability of dry-processing imager system DRYPRO 722/SD-P].
    Sonobe F; Toyooka K; Abe S; Tanaka T; Naka E; Fujisaki T; Nishimura K; Saitoh H; Mochizuki Y
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 12766281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. DIFFERENCES IN DENSITY IN WET AND DRY X-RAY FILMS.
    CLARKE WG; LATHAM SM
    Br J Radiol; 1965 Jan; 38():63-70. PubMed ID: 14236023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications.
    Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Latent image fading in screen-film mammography: lack of clinical relevance for batch-processed films.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 7824715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Defecography: techniques for improved image quality.
    Rafert JA; Lappas JC; Wilkins W
    Radiol Technol; 1990; 61(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 2367636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT.
    Kalra MK; Maher MM; Toth TL; Schmidt B; Westerman BL; Morgan HT; Saini S
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):649-57. PubMed ID: 15498896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Russian chemicals designed for processing the radiographic medical films].
    Larionov VN; Leont'ev VG
    Med Tekh; 2004; (4):38-43. PubMed ID: 15455822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproduction of radiologic images on plain paper.
    Ibbott GS; Zhang Y; Mohiuddin M; Adams E
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):755-60. PubMed ID: 9599396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of developer depletion on image quality of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Casanova MS; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15314003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.