These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11378226)

  • 41. Evaluation of dry silver hard copies in digital radiography.
    Trefler M; Yrizarry JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Oct; 149(4):853-6. PubMed ID: 3498340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Two technologies for designing digital X-ray image detectors].
    Borisov AA; Veĭp IuA; Mazurov AI; Elinson MB
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):7-10. PubMed ID: 17133935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Digital systems require x-ray charts too.
    Eastman TR
    Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(4):354. PubMed ID: 8778917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Maintenance of automatic dental film processors.
    Thunthy KH
    LDA J; 1996; 55(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 9569822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [X-ray film evaluation with a new equidensitometric film (author's transl)].
    Müllenberg W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 Oct; 121(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 4373351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiographic stereoplotting. A new technique and its application to the study of the spine.
    Jacoby RK; Sims-Williams H; Jayson MI; Baddley H
    Ann Rheum Dis; 1976 Apr; 35(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 942274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Equipment for processing medical radiographic films].
    Koveshnikov AI
    Med Tekh; 1997; (5):41-7. PubMed ID: 9445982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Three- tier rare-earth imaging system.
    Brodeur AE; Silberstein MJ; Graviss ER; Ferguson TL; Ortmeyer KM; Nalesnik WJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Apr; 136(4):755-8. PubMed ID: 6784471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Research and advancement of image-guided radiotherapy].
    Yu JM; Yuan SH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 28(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 16750004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Use of an roentgenologic film with reduced silver content and dye-enhanced image].
    Gurvich AM; Vlasov PV; Kishkovskiĭ AN; Lantsov VP; Tombak MI
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1985; (5):71-4. PubMed ID: 4090256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Technical aspects of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9587768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Electronic and film portal images: a comparison of landmark visibility and review accuracy.
    Kruse JJ; Herman MG; Hagness CR; Davis BJ; Garces YI; Haddock MG; Olivier KR; Stafford SL; Pisansky TM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Oct; 54(2):584-91. PubMed ID: 12243839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Digital radiology. Clinical experience].
    Stacul F; Smathers RL
    Radiol Med; 1985 Nov; 71(11):732-9. PubMed ID: 4095289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Who needs darkrooms?
    Gaynor LL; Irwin GA
    Radiol Technol; 1976; 47(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 1246573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative image quality of 105 mm and conventional spot films.
    Weaver KE; Trembley CA; Lewicki AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):615-8. PubMed ID: 6607654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.