These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11378597)
1. Conflict resolution at the end of life. Fetters MD; Churchill L; Danis M Crit Care Med; 2001 May; 29(5):921-5. PubMed ID: 11378597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating a patient's request for life-prolonging treatment: an ethical framework. Winkler EC; Hiddemann W; Marckmann G J Med Ethics; 2012 Nov; 38(11):647-51. PubMed ID: 22692859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Questioning care at the end of life. Ruopp P; Good MJ; Lakoma M; Gadmer NM; Arnold RM; Block SD J Palliat Med; 2005 Jun; 8(3):510-20. PubMed ID: 15992192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization]. Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physicians' religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes and behaviors. Wenger NS; Carmel S Mt Sinai J Med; 2004 Oct; 71(5):335-43. PubMed ID: 15543435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What triggers requests for ethics consultations? DuVal G; Sartorius L; Clarridge B; Gensler G; Danis M J Med Ethics; 2001 Apr; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i24-9. PubMed ID: 11314608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preferences of physicians and their patients for end-of-life care. Gramelspacher GP; Zhou XH; Hanna MP; Tierney WM J Gen Intern Med; 1997 Jun; 12(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 9192251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study. Willmott L; White B; Gallois C; Parker M; Graves N; Winch S; Callaway LK; Shepherd N; Close E J Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 42(8):496-503. PubMed ID: 27188227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicians' responses to patients' requests for physician-assisted suicide. Kohlwes RJ; Koepsell TD; Rhodes LA; Pearlman RA Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):657-63. PubMed ID: 11231697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Narrative nuances on good and bad deaths: internists' tales from high-technology work places. DelVecchio Good MJ; Gadmer NM; Ruopp P; Lakoma M; Sullivan AM; Redinbaugh E; Arnold RM; Block SD Soc Sci Med; 2004 Mar; 58(5):939-53. PubMed ID: 14732607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reasons behind providing futile medical treatments in Iran. Aghabarary M; Nayeri ND Nurs Ethics; 2017 Feb; 24(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 27000190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is experience a good teacher? How interns and attending physicians understand patients' choices for end-of-life care. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Wilson IB; Green ML; Goldman L; Tsevat J; Cook EF; Phillips RS Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 9107618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Life-sustaining treatments: what doctors do, what they want for themselves and what elderly persons want. Carmel S Soc Sci Med; 1999 Nov; 49(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 10509829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding physicians' skills at providing end-of-life care perspectives of patients, families, and health care workers. Curtis JR; Wenrich MD; Carline JD; Shannon SE; Ambrozy DM; Ramsey PG J Gen Intern Med; 2001 Jan; 16(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 11251749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Schneiderman LJ; Gilmer T; Teetzel HD Crit Care Med; 2000 Dec; 28(12):3920-4. PubMed ID: 11153636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical futility decisions and physicians' legal defensiveness: the impact of anticipated conflict on thresholds for end-of-life treatment. Swanson JW; McCrary SV Soc Sci Med; 1996 Jan; 42(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8745113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hofmann JC; Wenger NS; Davis RB; Teno J; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS Ann Intern Med; 1997 Jul; 127(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 9214246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Treatment decisions in advanced cancer. An empirical-ethical study on physicians' criteria and the process of decision making]. Schildmann J; Vollmann J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Nov; 135(45):2230-4. PubMed ID: 21046529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting physicians' decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments in terminal care. Hinkka H; Kosunen E; Metsänoja R; Lammi UK; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P J Med Ethics; 2002 Apr; 28(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11934941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]