118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11379578)
1. Routine audit is an ethical requirement of screening.
Sasieni P; Cuzick J
BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1179. PubMed ID: 11379578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Audit shows weaknesses in cervical cancer screening.
Ferriman A
BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1141. PubMed ID: 11348903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abnormal cervical cytology in Queensland.
Wright RG; Cox NC; Shield PW; McDonald AA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 May; 31(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 1930047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Law, ethics and epidemiology: the case of the cervical screening audit.
Davidson H; Dawson J; Moore A
N Z Bioeth J; 2001 Jun; 2(2):8-26. PubMed ID: 15586993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine audit of large-scale cervical cancer screening programs.
Cuzick J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):605-6. PubMed ID: 18445817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The management of a cervical screening programme: a statement (October 1985). The ICRF Coordinating Committee on Cervical Screening.
Community Med; 1986 Aug; 8(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 3769428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Gisborne Inquiry--what can we learn?
Richardson A
N Z Med J; 2001 May; 114(1132):236-8. PubMed ID: 11453362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ethics of paternalism and preventive screening.
Doyal L; Schamroth A
Practitioner; 1988 Jul; 232(1452):820-3. PubMed ID: 3255970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical issues for cancer screenings. Five countries--four types of cancer.
Ustun C; Ceber E
Prev Med; 2004 Aug; 39(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 15226029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multifactorial audit of invasive cervical cancer.
Rubin A
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Aug; 48(8):785. PubMed ID: 7560214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast screening--time for review.
Skegg D
N Z Med J; 2001 Jun; 114(1134):299. PubMed ID: 11480516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of screening to prevent cancer: think of screening as insurance.
Sasieni PD
BMJ; 2003 Jul; 327(7405):50; author reply 50. PubMed ID: 12842960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Should the law require doctors to make records available for audit of cervical screening?
Paul C
N Z Med J; 2001 Nov; 114(1143):499-500. PubMed ID: 11797876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct visual inspection for cervical cancer screening.
Suba EJ; Raab SS
Cancer; 2004 Nov; 101(10):2365; author reply 2366. PubMed ID: 15389478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand: bioethics commentary.
Pickering N
N Z Bioeth J; 2002 Feb; 3(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 15587483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical screening: striving for outcome beyond expectation.
Slater S
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 16719851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AIDS: an ethical puzzle.
Farmer R
Health Serv J; 1988 Jan; 98(5084):86-7. PubMed ID: 10287834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Crossing the quality chasm: a requirement for successful cervical cancer prevention in developing countries.
Suba EJ
Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):945-63. PubMed ID: 15555750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. And now the failure of cervical screening.
N Z Med J; 2001 May; 114(1132):221-2. PubMed ID: 11453354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
