These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11380381)
21. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran. Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Women's preference on mode of delivery in Southern Italy. Mancuso A; De Vivo A; Fanara G; Settineri S; Triolo O; Giacobbe A Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 16752261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Experience of Women Giving Birth after Cesarean Section-A Longitudinal Observational Study. Sys D; Kajdy A; Niżniowska M; Baranowska B; Raczkiewicz D; Tataj-Puzyna U Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Jun; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 37372923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Going public: do risk and choice explain differences in caesarean birth rates between public and private places of birth in Australia? Miller YD; Prosser SJ; Thompson R Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):627-35. PubMed ID: 22877762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predictors of fear of childbirth and normal vaginal birth among Iranian postpartum women: a cross-sectional study. Mortazavi F; Mehrabadi M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Apr; 21(1):316. PubMed ID: 33882872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Gamble JA; Creedy DK Birth; 2000 Dec; 27(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 11251511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway. Lindstad Løvåsmoen EM; Nyland Bjørgo M; Lukasse M; Schei B; Henriksen L Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():206-212. PubMed ID: 29804768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Timing the provision of a pregnancy decision-aid: temporal patterns of preference for mode of birth during pregnancy. Shorten A; Shorten B Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Oct; 97(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 25082724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale. Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Systematic review of nulliparous women's views of planned cesarean birth: the missing component in the debate about a term cephalic trial. Kingdon C; Baker L; Lavender T Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 16948723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Women's perspectives on health facility and system levels factors influencing mode of delivery in Tehran: a qualitative study. Shirzad M; Shakibazadeh E; Betran AP; Bohren MA; Abedini M Reprod Health; 2019 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 30736792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Women's views and preferences regarding the mode of birth after cesarean section: Polish cross-sectional web-based survey. Sys D; Baranowska B; Kajdy A; Tataj-Puzyna U; Gotlib J; Bączek G; Juszczakiewicz P; Rabijewski M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jun; 273():26-32. PubMed ID: 35453069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Women's experiences and preferences following Caesarean birth. Dodd J; Pearce E; Crowther C Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):521-4. PubMed ID: 15598289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section. Gamble J; Creedy DK; McCourt C; Weaver J; Beake S Birth; 2007 Dec; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 18021149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do Italian mothers prefer cesarean delivery? Donati S; Grandolfo ME; Andreozzi S Birth; 2003 Jun; 30(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 12752165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Childbirth Fear: Relation to Birth and Care Provider Preferences. Stoll K; Fairbrother N; Thordarson DS J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Jan; 63(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 29364575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Complexities of choice after prior cesarean: a narrative analysis. Shorten A; Shorten B; Kennedy HP Birth; 2014 Jun; 41(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 24702477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Women's preferences for mode of second birth-A prospective study of two Israeli birth cohorts. Preis H; Mor P; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Samueloff A; Gabbay-Benziv R; Chen R; Eisner M; Pardo J; Peled Y; Wiznitzer A; Benyamini Y Birth; 2020 Jun; 47(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 32052497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Analysis of social factors of pregnant women's cesarean section demands]. Guo H; Zhou X; Li S Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Sep; 80(9):675-7. PubMed ID: 11798835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Historic cohort study on mode of delivery of a macrosomic baby: the women's point of view. Vercellini P; Fumagalli M; Consonni D; de Braud L; Barbara G; Iurlaro E; Mosca F; Fedele L Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1235-44. PubMed ID: 26248808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]