114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11381367)
1. Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Sehdev AE; Pan CC; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 May; 32(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 11381367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor.
Epstein JI; Pound CR; Partin AW; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1998 Jul; 160(1):97-100; discussion 101. PubMed ID: 9628613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy.
Miyamoto H; Hernandez DJ; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1693-8. PubMed ID: 19683331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic implications of partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: comparison of 3 methods.
Iremashvili V; Lokeshwar SD; Jorda M; Pelaez L; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2013 Jul; 190(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 23246479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: detection of positive margins and extraprostatic extension.
Iremashvili V; Lokeshwar SD; Soloway MS; Pelaez L; Umar SA; Manoharan M; Jordá M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 23095506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens do not increase detection of adverse pathological features.
Hollenbeck BK; Bassily N; Wei JT; Montie JE; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1583-6. PubMed ID: 11025709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in men with biopsy Gleason score of 8 or greater.
Nakanishi H; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2441-5; discussion 2445-6. PubMed ID: 18930495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated by radical prostatectomy: a study of 47 cases.
Osunkoya AO; Nielsen ME; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Mar; 32(3):468-72. PubMed ID: 18300802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
