These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11381952)

  • 1. Transaction costs and sequential bargaining in transferable discharge permit markets.
    Netusil NR; Braden JB
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Mar; 61(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 11381952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Including non-point sfources in a water quality trading permit program.
    Collentine D
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(3-4):47-53. PubMed ID: 15850173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phase-in of nonpoint sources in a transferable discharge permit system for water quality management: setting permit prices.
    Collentine D
    Ambio; 2005 Nov; 34(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 16435748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementing the water framework directive: contract design and the cost of measures to reduce nitrogen pollution from agriculture.
    Bartolini F; Gallerani V; Raggi M; Viaggi D
    Environ Manage; 2007 Oct; 40(4):567-77. PubMed ID: 17879126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introducing nonpoint source transferable quotas in nitrogen trading: The effects of transaction costs and uncertainty.
    Zhou X; Ye W; Zhang B
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 168():252-9. PubMed ID: 26724699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effluent trading for water quality management: concept and application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
    Nishizawa E
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2003; 47(1-6):169-74. PubMed ID: 12787615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An inexact fuzzy two-stage stochastic model for quantifying the efficiency of nonpoint source effluent trading under uncertainty.
    Luo B; Maqsood I; Huang GH; Yin YY; Han DJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Jul; 347(1-3):21-34. PubMed ID: 16084964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling and simulation of point-non-point source effluent trading in Taihu Lake area: perspective of non-point sources control in China.
    Wang X; Zhang W; Huang Y; Li S
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 325(1-3):39-50. PubMed ID: 15144776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Watershed-based point sources permitting strategy and dynamic permit-trading analysis.
    Ning SK; Chang NB
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 16930806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The link between 'green' and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance.
    Schaltegger S; Synnestvedt T
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Aug; 65(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 12369398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the Coase theorem hold in real markets? An application to the negotiations between waterworks and farmers in Denmark.
    Abildtrup J; Jensen F; Dubgaard A
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Jan; 93(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 22054583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishing politically feasible water markets: a multi-criteria approach.
    Ballestero E; Alarcón S; García-Bernabeu A
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Aug; 65(4):411-29. PubMed ID: 12369403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baseline requirements can hinder trades in water quality trading programs: Evidence from the Conestoga watershed.
    Ghosh G; Ribaudo M; Shortle J
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Aug; 92(8):2076-84. PubMed ID: 21507559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Policy design and performance of emissions trading markets: an adaptive agent-based analysis.
    Bing Z; Qinqin Y; Jun B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Aug; 44(15):5693-9. PubMed ID: 20590153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward quantifying the effectiveness of water trading under uncertainty.
    Luo B; Huang GH; Zou Y; Yin YY
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 16624478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of water protection measures on the profitability of farms.
    Schultheiss U; Jäger P; Döhler H; Eurich-Menden B
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(3-4):383-91. PubMed ID: 15850212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discharge permit market and farm management nexus: an approach for eutrophication control in small basins with low-income farmers.
    Imani S; Niksokhan MH; Jamshidi S; Abbaspour KC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Jul; 189(7):346. PubMed ID: 28634869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land.
    Dosskey MG
    Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 28(5):577-98. PubMed ID: 11568840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-zonal tradable discharge permit system to control water pollution in Tianjin, China.
    Cao H; Ikeda S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Jul; 39(13):4692-9. PubMed ID: 16053065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simulation-based interval two-stage stochastic model for agricultural non-point source pollution control through land retirement.
    Luo B; Li JB; Huang GH; Li HL
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 May; 361(1-3):38-56. PubMed ID: 16242757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.