These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Surface-illuminant ambiguity and color constancy: effects of scene complexity and depth cues. Kraft JM; Maloney SI; Brainard DH Perception; 2002; 31(2):247-63. PubMed ID: 11922136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Observers cannot accurately estimate the speed of an approaching object in flight. Rushton SK; Duke PA Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(15):1919-28. PubMed ID: 19146869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vergence in reverspective: percept-driven versus data-driven eye movement control. Wagner M; Ehrenstein WH; Papathomas TV Neurosci Lett; 2009 Jan; 449(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 18996440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blur and contrast as pictorial depth cues. O'Shea RP; Govan DG; Sekuler R Perception; 1997; 26(5):599-612. PubMed ID: 9488884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of illumination direction on the pictorial reliefs of Lambertian surfaces. Nefs HT; Koenderink JJ; Kappers AM Perception; 2005; 34(3):275-87. PubMed ID: 15895627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis. Makino Y; Yano M Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Psychophysical and vergence responses of normal and stereoanomalous observers to pulse-disparity stimulus]. Shimono K; Kondo M; Shibuta K; Nakamizo S Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Aug; 53(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 7176232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Depth from binocular half-occlusions in stereoscopic images of natural scenes. Wilcox LM; Lakra DC Perception; 2007; 36(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 17718362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Depth relief. Koenderink JJ; van Doorn AJ; Kappers AM Perception; 1995; 24(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 7617415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of mirror reflections and planar rotations of pictures on the shape percept of the depicted object. Cornelis EV; van Doorn AJ; Wagemans J Perception; 2009; 38(10):1439-66. PubMed ID: 19950478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Horses are sensitive to pictorial depth cues. Timney B; Keil K Perception; 1996; 25(9):1121-8. PubMed ID: 8983051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blur discrimination and its relation to blur-mediated depth perception. Mather G; Smith DR Perception; 2002; 31(10):1211-9. PubMed ID: 12430948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pictorial depth and related constancy effects as a function of recognition. Rock I; Shallo J; Schwartz F Perception; 1978; 7(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 628579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver variance in perceptual performance and learning. Fahle M; Henke-Fahle S Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 37(5):869-77. PubMed ID: 8603871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The framing effect with rectangular and trapezoidal surfaces: actual and pictorial surface slant, frame orientation, and viewing condition. Reinhardt-Rutland AH Perception; 1999; 28(11):1361-71. PubMed ID: 10755145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]