These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11383294)

  • 1. Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.
    Liljenqvist U; Hackenberg L; Link T; Halm H
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2001 Apr; 67(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 11383294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.
    Cordista A; Conrad B; Horodyski M; Walters S; Rechtine G
    Spine J; 2006; 6(4):444-9. PubMed ID: 16825053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density.
    Hackenberg L; Link T; Liljenqvist U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 May; 27(9):937-42. PubMed ID: 11979165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
    Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.
    Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis.
    Lehman RA; Polly DW; Kuklo TR; Cunningham B; Kirk KL; Belmont PJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14501914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques.
    White KK; Oka R; Mahar AT; Lowry A; Garfin SR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):E355-8. PubMed ID: 16721279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
    Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique.
    Mahar AT; Bagheri R; Oka R; Kostial P; Akbarnia BA
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 18082463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Pullout resistance of conventional pedicle screw implantation in comparison to fluoroscopic computer-assisted technique].
    Linhardt O; Perlick L; Renkawitz T; Matussek J; Plitz W; Grifka J
    Zentralbl Chir; 2006 Oct; 131(5):407-10. PubMed ID: 17089290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
    Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
    Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
    Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine.
    Paik H; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Kang DG; Lenke LG
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 22480532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
    Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation.
    van Laar W; Meester RJ; Smit TH; van Royen BJ
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1209-14. PubMed ID: 17203270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stability of pedicle screws after kyphoplasty augmentation: an experimental study to compare transpedicular screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement.
    Linhardt O; Lüring C; Matussek J; Hamberger C; Plitz W; Grifka J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 16760780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
    Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.