These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11384130)
1. Measuring the effects of image interpretation: an evaluative framework. Robinson P Clin Radiol; 2001 May; 56(5):348-9. PubMed ID: 11384130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring the effects of image interpretation: an evaluative framework. Brealey S Clin Radiol; 2001 May; 56(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 11384129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Communication of doubt and certainty in radiological reports. Hobby JL; Tom BD; Todd C; Bearcroft PW; Dixon AK Br J Radiol; 2000 Sep; 73(873):999-1001. PubMed ID: 11064655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic radiology reporting and communication: the ACR guideline. Kushner DC; Lucey LL; J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17411755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence. Lee JK J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A statistical framework for image category search from a mental picture. Ferecatu M; Geman D IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 Jun; 31(6):1087-101. PubMed ID: 19372612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The American Board of Radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: Part IV--practice quality improvement in diagnostic radiology. Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 17434077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The American Board of Radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: part IV--practice quality improvement in diagnostic radiology. Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):300-4. PubMed ID: 17467612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Possible reasons for study results. Prabhu SP; Goddard PR Clin Radiol; 2004 Oct; 59(10):961; author reply 961-2. PubMed ID: 15451360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cultural competency in diagnostic imaging. Lee FH; Worrell JA Acad Radiol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 15721600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving mammographic interpretation: double reading and computer-aided diagnosis. Helvie M Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):801-11, vi. PubMed ID: 17888770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appropriateness of test use in pathology: a new era or reinventing the wheel? Smellie WS Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Nov; 40(Pt 6):585-92. PubMed ID: 14629797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is a good radiologist? Amis ES J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):155. PubMed ID: 17411547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Managing errors in radiology: a working model (2). Chakraverty S; Wright J Clin Radiol; 2005 Feb; 60(2):276. PubMed ID: 15664587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing errors in radiology: a working model (1). Wells IP Clin Radiol; 2005 Feb; 60(2):275; author reply 275-6. PubMed ID: 15664586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology. Alpert HR; Hillman BJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Errors in radiologic studies]. Mali WP Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Apr; 146(17):792-3. PubMed ID: 12014235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms. Serre T; Wolf L; Bileschi S; Riesenhuber M; Poggio T IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2007 Mar; 29(3):411-26. PubMed ID: 17224612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimum standards should be set for near patient testing. Crook M BMJ; 1996 May; 312(7039):1157. PubMed ID: 8620145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]