These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11385848)

  • 1. System analysis for optimal control of a wastewater treatment benchmark.
    Vrecko D; Hvala N; Kocijan J; Zec M
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):199-206. PubMed ID: 11385848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ranking stormwater control strategies under uncertainty: the River Cam case study.
    Duchesne S; Beck MB; Reda AL
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):311-20. PubMed ID: 11385863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of surrogate modelling for multiobjective optimisation of urban wastewater systems.
    Fu G; Khu ST; Butler D
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1641-7. PubMed ID: 19759467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operational control of storm sewage at an activated sludge process.
    Chen J; Beck MB
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):131-8. PubMed ID: 11385839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study.
    Stare A; Vrecko D; Hvala N; Strmcnik S
    Water Res; 2007 May; 41(9):2004-14. PubMed ID: 17346768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimisation potential for a SBR plant based upon integrated modelling for dry and wet weather conditions.
    Rönner-Holm SG; Kaufmann Alves I; Steinmetz H; Holm NC
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):1953-64. PubMed ID: 19844042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global sensitivity analysis of the BSM2 dynamic influent disturbance scenario generator.
    Flores-Alsina X; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(11):1912-22. PubMed ID: 22592459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parameter optimisation of real-time control strategies for urban wastewater systems.
    Schütze M; Butler D; Beck MB
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):139-46. PubMed ID: 11385840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feedforward-feedback control of dissolved oxygen concentration in a predenitrification system.
    Yong M; Yongzhen P; Shuying W
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2005 Jul; 27(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 15900439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Closed-loop identification and control application for dissolved oxygen concentration in a full-scale coke wastewater treatment plant.
    Yoo CK; Cho JH; Kwak HJ; Choi SK; Chun HD; Lee I
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):207-14. PubMed ID: 11385849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy.
    Nopens I; Benedetti L; Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1967-74. PubMed ID: 21045320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of multivariable statistical techniques in plant-wide WWTP control strategies analysis.
    Flores X; Comas J; Roda IR; Jiménez L; Gernaey KV
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):75-83. PubMed ID: 17898446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation.
    Rosen C; Jeppsson U; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):41-9. PubMed ID: 15685978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulation study with minimised additional data requirements to analyse control and operation of WWTP Dorsten, Germany.
    Alex J; Hetschel M; Ogurek M
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1371-7. PubMed ID: 19759438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
    Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Nopens I; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):67-78. PubMed ID: 17978434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation and implementation of model based control strategies at an industrial wastewater treatment plant.
    Demey D; Vanderhaegen B; Vanhooren H; Liessens J; Van Eyck L; Hopkins L; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):145-53. PubMed ID: 11547977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic optimisation of WWTP inflow to reduce total emission.
    Tränckner J; Franz T; Seggelke K; Krebs P
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(10):11-8. PubMed ID: 18048972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wastewater treatment benchmark: what can be achieved with simple control?
    Vrecko D; Hvala N; Kocijan J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):127-34. PubMed ID: 11936625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.