BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11385856)

  • 41. Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) system: a case study.
    Kaur S; Singh M
    Indian J Environ Health; 2002 Jul; 44(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 14503450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes.
    Chen Z; Ngo HH; Guo W
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 426():13-31. PubMed ID: 22521163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Aspects of decision support in water management--example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) II--improvement of management strategies.
    Simon U; Brüggemann R; Pudenz S
    Water Res; 2004 Nov; 38(19):4085-92. PubMed ID: 15491656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".
    Dumreicher H
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 87(2):204-15. PubMed ID: 17888563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Estimating the costs of collective treatment of wastewater: the case of Walloon Region (Belgium).
    Dogot T; Xanthoulis Y; Fonder N; Xanthoulis D
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):640-8. PubMed ID: 20706011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries.
    Massoud MA; Tarhini A; Nasr JA
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):652-9. PubMed ID: 18701206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Analysis of scenarios for wastewater and urban drainage systems in Brazil based on an integrated modeling approach.
    Soares SR; Parkinson J; Bernardes RS
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(9):53-60. PubMed ID: 16445173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Performance-costs evaluation for urban storm drainage.
    Baptista M; Barraud S; Alfakih E; Nascimento N; Fernandes W; Moura P; Castro L
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 15790233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cost benefit risk--a concept for management of integrated urban wastewater systems?
    Hauger MB; Rauch W; Linde JJ; Mikkelsen PS
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 11902470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A decision support tool for sustainable planning of urban water systems: presenting the Dynamic Urban Water Simulation Model.
    Willuweit L; O'Sullivan JJ
    Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(20):7206-20. PubMed ID: 24183560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Contribution of Geographic Information Systems and location models to planning of wastewater systems.
    Leitão JP; Matos JS; Gonçalves AB; Matos JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 16206838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Role playing games: a methodology to acquire knowledge for integrated wastewater infrastructures management in a river basin scale.
    Prat P; Aulinas M; Turon C; Comas J; Poch M
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1809-16. PubMed ID: 19448317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Ranking potential impacts of priority and emerging pollutants in urban wastewater through life cycle impact assessment.
    Muñoz I; José Gómez M; Molina-Díaz A; Huijbregts MA; Fernández-Alba AR; García-Calvo E
    Chemosphere; 2008 Dec; 74(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 18951608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Criteria for assessment of the operational potential of the urban wastewater system.
    Schütze M; Butler D; Beck MB; Verworn HR
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 11902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Life cycle assessment of three water systems in Copenhagen--a management tool of the future.
    Godskesen B; Zambrano KC; Trautner A; Johansen NB; Thiesson L; Andersen L; Clauson-Kaas J; Neidel TL; Rygaard M; Kløverpris NH; Albrechtsen HJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(3):565-72. PubMed ID: 21278481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Onsite wastewater differential treatment system: modeling approach.
    Lopez Zavala MA; Funamizu N; Takakuwa T
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):317-24. PubMed ID: 12381007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.
    Thorneloe SA; Weitz K; Jambeck J
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1006-20. PubMed ID: 17433663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant.
    Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A preliminary study on potential of developing shower/laundry wastewater reclamation and reuse system.
    Lu W; Leung AY
    Chemosphere; 2003 Sep; 52(9):1451-9. PubMed ID: 12867175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.