These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11386286)

  • 1. Testing poor pregnant women for cocaine--physicians as police investigators.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2001 May; 344(22):1729-32. PubMed ID: 11386286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High court bars some drug tests.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Mar; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 12159852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional law: Fourth Circuit upholds cocaine testing of pregnant women.
    Dubin JM
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(3):279-81. PubMed ID: 11067607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A feminist Fourth Amendment?: Consent, care, privacy, and social meaning in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Taslitz AE
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():1-79. PubMed ID: 14986665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Punitive versus public health oriented responses to drug use by pregnant women.
    Schroedel JR; Fiber P
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():217-35. PubMed ID: 12669331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What about my right to privacy? Where the Court went wrong in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Barton EF
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):261-92. PubMed ID: 12645550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pregnant drug abusers are treated like criminals or not treated at all: a third option proposed.
    Kimbel AS
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 21(1):36-66. PubMed ID: 15799534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive health and blurred professional boundaries.
    Chavkin W; Breitbart V
    Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 8932462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case.
    Weyrauch S
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnancy, drug testing, and the fourth amendment: legal and behavioral implications.
    Bornstein BH
    J Fam Psychol; 2003 Jun; 17(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 12828018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crack babies and the Constitution: ruminations about addicted pregnant women after Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Marrus E
    Villanova Law Rev; 2002; 47(2):299-340. PubMed ID: 12680368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Charleston policy on cocaine use during pregnancy: a cautionary tale.
    Jos PH; Marshall MF; Perlmutter M
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 7647880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Silent no more: physicians' legal and ethical obligations to patients seeking abortions.
    Law SA
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1994-1995; 21(2):279-321. PubMed ID: 11660619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Criminalization of pregnant substance abusers: a health care perspective.
    Popovits RM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jun; 24(6):169-81. PubMed ID: 10170728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Life, liberty, and law in conflict.
    Nelson LJ; Milliken N
    JAMA; 1988 Feb; 259(7):1060-6. PubMed ID: 3276942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drug use in pregnancy: to test, to tell--legal implications for the physician.
    Horowitz RM
    Semin Perinatol; 1991 Aug; 15(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 1948144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rights of pregnant women: the Supreme Court and drug testing.
    Gostin LO
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 12974111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is obtaining an arrestee's DNA a valid special needs search under the fourth amendment? What should (and will) the Supreme Court do?
    Maclin T
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(1):102-24. PubMed ID: 15938073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pregnant drug abusers are treated like criminals or not treated at all: a third option proposed.
    Kimbel AS
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 19(2):521-52. PubMed ID: 14748256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.