These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11386475)

  • 1. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE; Barlow NN; Garner CB; Wilson DL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):879-92. PubMed ID: 11386475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prescriptive amplification recommendations for hearing losses with a conductive component and their impact on the required maximum power output: an update with accompanying clinical explanation.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):452-60. PubMed ID: 23886423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIDCD/VA hearing aid clinical trial and follow-up: coupler and real-ear measurement.
    Peek BF; Rosenfeld MA; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):282-91. PubMed ID: 17580724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of matching target insertion gains with open-fit hearing aids.
    Aazh H; Moore BC; Prasher D
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 22846638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insertion gain measurements using two low-powered analogue hearing aids.
    Norman M; James P
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 34(6):375-7. PubMed ID: 11201324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Harmonic distortion measurements in clinical hearing and fitting. Preliminary report.
    Nielsen HB; Nielsen H; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 2336541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).
    Brännström KJ; Wennerström I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):512-21. PubMed ID: 21034698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids.
    Putterman DB; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):366-78. PubMed ID: 22533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Sammeth CA; Peek BF; Bratt GW; Bess FH; Amberg SM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jan; 4(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 8422481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
    Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of real-ear insertion gains in Japanese-speaking individuals wearing hearing aids with DSLv5 and NAL-NL2.
    Furuki S; Sano H; Kurioka T; Ogiwara A; Nakagawa T; Inoue R; Umehara S; Hara Y; Suzuki K; Yamashita T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Feb; 48(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 32747167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions.
    Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R; Britton L; Steinberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S16-25. PubMed ID: 20109083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
    Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitting low ratio compression to people with severe and profound hearing losses.
    Barker C; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 11324842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of an Automated Hearing Aid Fitting Using Real Ear Measures Embedded in a Manufacturer Fitting Software.
    Brockmeyer A; Voss A; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):157-163. PubMed ID: 34062602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.