These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11386475)

  • 21. Maximum real-ear gain of in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Erickson FN; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 2046359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain.
    Perry TT; Nelson PB; Van Tasell DJ
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837124. PubMed ID: 30880645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. User preference and reliability of bilateral hearing aid gain adjustments.
    Hornsby BW; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):158-70. PubMed ID: 18669129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit.
    Narayanan SE; Manjula P
    Codas; 2021; 34(1):e20200310. PubMed ID: 34669764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The value of routine real ear measurement of the gain of digital hearing aids.
    Aazh H; Moore BC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Sep; 18(8):653-64. PubMed ID: 18326152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Newborn hearing screening follow-up: factors affecting hearing aid fitting by 6 months of age.
    Spivak L; Sokol H; Auerbach C; Gershkovich S
    Am J Audiol; 2009 Jun; 18(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 19029532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship of acoustic gain to aided threshold improvement in children.
    Jirsa RE; Norris TW
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1978 Aug; 43(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 692100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements.
    Mason D; Popelka GR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 3724114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hearing-aid outcome measured following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly.
    Humes LE; Garner CB; Wilson DL; Barlow NN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):469-86. PubMed ID: 11407554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.
    Mackersie C; Boothroyd A; Lithgow A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 29894379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimising hearing aid output to paediatric prescriptive targets improves outcomes in children.
    Amri NA; Quar TK; Chong FY; Bagatto M
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Nov; 61(11):924-931. PubMed ID: 34859745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of in-the-ear and over-the-ear hearing aid fittings.
    Cox RM; Risberg DM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Nov; 51(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 3773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Candidature for hearing aids: justification for the concept and a two-part audiometric criterion.
    Haggard M; Gatehouse S
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Oct; 27(5):303-18. PubMed ID: 8205076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Real-ear measurement verification for open, non-occluding hearing instruments.
    Lantz J; Jensen OD; Haastrup A; Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 17365050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Achieving prescribed gain/frequency responses with advances in hearing aid technology.
    Sammeth CA; Preves DA; Bratt GW; Peek BF; Bess FH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8263820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hearing aids and otosclerosis.
    Johnson EW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1993 Jun; 26(3):491-502. PubMed ID: 8341576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preferred hearing aid gain and bass-cut in relation to prescriptive fitting.
    Leijon A; Eriksson-Mangold M; Bech-Karlsen A
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 6494801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.