123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11386484)
1. Multidimensional scaling of nasal voice quality.
Zraick RI; Liss JM; Dorman MF; Case JL; LaPointe LL; Beals SP
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):989-96. PubMed ID: 11386484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation of nasal voice quality.
Zraick RI; Liss JM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):979-88. PubMed ID: 11386483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females.
Gelfer MP
Phonetica; 1993; 50(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8516383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual differences in voice quality perception.
Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K; Berke GS
J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 1608242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: individual differences in perception.
Shrivastav R
J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 16165342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissimilarity and the classification of male singing voices.
Erickson ML
J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 17134873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multidimensional scaling analysis of dysphonia in two speaker groups.
Kempster GB; Kistler DJ; Hillenbrand J
J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 2072677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inexperienced Listeners' Perception of Timbre Dissimilarity Within and Between Voice Categories.
Erickson ML
J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):302.e1-302.e13. PubMed ID: 30316552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: evidence for partial compensation.
Beddor PS; Krakow RA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2868-87. PubMed ID: 10573902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dissimilarity and the classification of female singing voices: a preliminary study.
Erickson ML
J Voice; 2003 Jun; 17(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 12825652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experienced Listeners' Perception of Timbre Dissimilarity Within and Between Voice Categories.
Stone TC; Erickson ML
J Voice; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37302910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
Eadie TL; Baylor CR
J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptions of audible nasal emission in speakers with cleft palate: a comparative study of listener judgments.
Baylis AL; Munson B; Moller KT
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 20572776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality.
Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1291-302. PubMed ID: 7962996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
Bishop J; Keating P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre- and posttreatment voice and speech outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: expert listeners' and patient's perception.
van der Molen L; van Rossum MA; Jacobi I; van Son RJ; Smeele LE; Rasch CR; Hilgers FJ
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):664.e25-33. PubMed ID: 22209059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of pre-vocalic and post-vocalic consonants produced by tracheoesophageal speakers.
Doyle PC; Haaf RG
J Otolaryngol; 1989 Dec; 18(7):350-3. PubMed ID: 2593219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of feedback filtering on nasalization and self-perception of nasality.
Burzynski CM; Starr CD
J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):585-8. PubMed ID: 4087893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
