These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11386484)

  • 41. Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space.
    Kewley-Port D; Atal BS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 2708689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales.
    Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM; Nandur V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):323-35. PubMed ID: 15989395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of alaryngeal voice quality by nonparametric procedures.
    Imaizumi S; Boku S; Koike Y; Ohta F
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1983; 10(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 6615366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 11051513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of experience on judgments of adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Nicolici C; Baylor C; Almand K; Waugh P; Maronian N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2007 Sep; 116(9):695-701. PubMed ID: 17926593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Impact of aberrant acoustic properties on the perception of sound quality in electrolarynx speech.
    Meltzner GS; Hillman RE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):766-79. PubMed ID: 16378472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of training on the acoustic phonetic representation of synthetic speech.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC; Fenn K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1445-65. PubMed ID: 18055767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Correspondence between an accelerometric nasal/voice amplitude ratio and listeners' direct magnitude estimations of hypernasality.
    Redenbaugh MA; Reich AR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 28(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 4010257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Training listeners to report the acoustic correlate of formant-frequency scaling using synthetic voices.
    Barreda S; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1065-77. PubMed ID: 23363122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Loudness Trumps Pitch in Politeness Judgments: Evidence from Korean Deferential Speech.
    Idemaru K; Winter B; Brown L; Oh GE
    Lang Speech; 2020 Mar; 63(1):123-148. PubMed ID: 30732514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The processing of duration and intensity cues to prominence.
    Turk AE; Sawusch JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3782-90. PubMed ID: 8655809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech by naive and experienced judges through the use of semantic differential scales.
    van As CJ; Koopmans-van Beinum FJ; Pols LC; Hilgers FJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Aug; 46(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 12959472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non-nasal--nasal distinction for vowels.
    Hawkins S; Stevens KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1560-75. PubMed ID: 3989111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Gender differences in familiar voice identification.
    Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():131-40. PubMed ID: 23168357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Judgments of Intelligence and Likability of Young Adult Female Speakers of American English: The Influence of Vocal Fry and the Surrounding Acoustic-Prosodic Context.
    Parker MA; Borrie SA
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):538-545. PubMed ID: 28958872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Face-voice space: Integrating visual and auditory cues in judgments of person distinctiveness.
    Tatz JR; Peynircioğlu ZF; Brent W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3710-3727. PubMed ID: 32696231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The independent contribution of voice onset time to perceptual metrics of convergence.
    Schertz J; Johnson EK; Paquette-Smith M
    JASA Express Lett; 2021 Apr; 1(4):045205. PubMed ID: 36154201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
    Helou LB; Solomon NP; Henry LR; Coppit GL; Howard RS; Stojadinovic A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Aug; 19(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20484704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Effect of Experience on Response Time When Judging Synthesized Voice Quality.
    Kisenwether JS; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):394-7. PubMed ID: 26474719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. On the variability in F0 patterning and the function of F0 timing in languages where pitch cues stress.
    Thorsen N
    Phonetica; 1982; 39(4-5):302-16. PubMed ID: 7156210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.