These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11386521)

  • 1. Reentry site during fibrillation induction in relation to defibrillation efficacy for different shock waveforms.
    Ideker RE; Alferness C; Melnick S; Sreenan KM; Johnson E; Smith WM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 May; 12(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 11386521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs.
    Zhou X; Daubert JP; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1993 Jan; 72(1):145-60. PubMed ID: 8417837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms.
    Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep.
    Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epicardial sock mapping following monophasic and biphasic shocks of equal voltage with an endocardial lead system.
    Usui M; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 7(4):322-34. PubMed ID: 8777480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs.
    Zhou XH; Knisley SB; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1991 Jun; 68(6):1761-7. PubMed ID: 2036724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields.
    Yabe S; Smith WM; Daubert JP; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1990 May; 66(5):1190-203. PubMed ID: 2335021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of phase separation on biphasic waveform defibrillation.
    Cooper RA; Wallenius ST; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Mar; 16(3 Pt 1):471-82. PubMed ID: 7681199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs.
    Chen PS; Wolf PD; Melnick SD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1990 Jun; 66(6):1544-60. PubMed ID: 2344664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological effects of monophasic and biphasic stimuli in normal and infarcted dogs.
    Wharton JM; Richard VJ; Murry CE; Dixon EG; Reimer KA; Meador J; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Sep; 13(9):1158-72. PubMed ID: 1700392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting the relative efficacy of shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in dogs.
    White JB; Walcott GP; Wayland JL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 34(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 10459086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biphasic defibrillation waveforms reduce shock-induced response duration dispersion between low and high shock intensities.
    Tovar OH; Jones JL
    Circ Res; 1995 Aug; 77(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 7614727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ventricular defibrillation with triphasic waveforms.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1324-8. PubMed ID: 10725294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choosing the optimal monophasic and biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation.
    Walcott GP; Walker RG; Cates AW; Krassowska W; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Sep; 6(9):737-50. PubMed ID: 8556194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early postoperative rise in defibrillation threshold in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems: attenuation with biphasic shock waveforms.
    Schwartzman D; Callans DJ; Gottlieb CD; Heo J; Marchlinski FE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Jun; 7(6):483-93. PubMed ID: 8743754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Bardy GH; Gliner BE; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Anderson J; Troutman C; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 7882486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure.
    Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE
    Cardiovasc Res; 2004 Jan; 61(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 14732200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and a preceding unsuccessful shock on the probability of defibrillation success using biphasic waveforms in pigs.
    Windecker S; Kay GN; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Dec; 8(12):1386-95. PubMed ID: 9436776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.