These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11386573)

  • 1. Acoustic-phonetic features for the automatic classification of fricatives.
    Ali AM; Van der Spiegel J; Mueller P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2217-35. PubMed ID: 11386573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The characteristics of voicing in syllable-initial fricatives in American English.
    Pirello K; Blumstein SE; Kurowski K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3754-65. PubMed ID: 9193062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of stop place in consonant-vowel contexts using feature extrapolation of acoustic-phonetic features in telephone speech.
    Lee JW; Choi JY; Kang HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1536-46. PubMed ID: 22352523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unified Coding of Spectral and Temporal Phonetic Cues: Electrophysiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Features.
    Monahan PJ; Schertz J; Fu Z; Pérez A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 34(4):618-638. PubMed ID: 35061026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.
    Jongman A; Wayland R; Wong S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1252-63. PubMed ID: 11008825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech.
    Gordon PC; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):153-78. PubMed ID: 6232338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of acoustic parameters for consonant voicing classification in clean and telephone speech.
    Lee SM; Choi JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL197-202. PubMed ID: 22423808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diverse acoustic cues at consonantal landmarks.
    Stevens KN
    Phonetica; 2000; 57(2-4):139-51. PubMed ID: 10992135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production.
    Silbert N; de Jong K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2769-79. PubMed ID: 18529193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters.
    Stevens KN; Blumstein SE; Glicksman L; Burton M; Kurowski K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2979-3000. PubMed ID: 1629490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of language on the acoustic properties of phonetic features: a study of the feature [strident] in Ewe and English.
    Utman JA; Blumstein SE
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):221-38. PubMed ID: 7938204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of voice-onset time in continuous speech using temporal measures.
    Prathosh AP; Ramakrishnan AG; Ananthapadmanabha TV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL122-8. PubMed ID: 25096135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speaker-independent consonant classification in continuous speech with distinctive features and neural networks.
    De Mori R; Flammia G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3091-103. PubMed ID: 8300949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.
    Nguyen DD; Chacon A; Payten C; Black R; Sheth M; McCabe P; Novakovic D; Madill C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Mar; 57(2):366-380. PubMed ID: 35166414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voicing and devoicing assimilation of French /s/ and /z/.
    Abdelli-Beruh NB
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2012 Oct; 41(5):371-86. PubMed ID: 22127548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Durational cues to fricative codas in 2-year-olds' American English: voicing and morphemic factors.
    Song JY; Demuth K; Evans K; Shattuck-Hufnagel S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2931-46. PubMed ID: 23654398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic characteristics of Greek fricatives.
    Nirgianaki E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):2964-76. PubMed ID: 24815276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stop-like modification of the dental fricative /ð/: an acoustic analysis.
    Zhao SY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2009-20. PubMed ID: 20968372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic analysis and detection of pharyngeal fricative in cleft palate speech using correlation of signals in independent frequency bands and octave spectrum prominent peak.
    He F; Wang X; Yin H; Zhang H; Yang G; He L
    Biomed Eng Online; 2020 May; 19(1):36. PubMed ID: 32460765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development.
    Li F; Munson B; Edwards J; Yoneyama K; Hall K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):999-1011. PubMed ID: 21361456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.