131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11386625)
1. Preference for equity as a framing effect.
Ubel PA; Baron J; Asch DA
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(3):180-9. PubMed ID: 11386625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are preferences for equity over efficiency in health care allocation "all or nothing"?
Ubel PA; Baron J; Nash B; Asch DA
Med Care; 2000 Apr; 38(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 10752968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis in a setting of budget constraints--is it equitable?
Ubel PA; DeKay ML; Baron J; Asch DA
N Engl J Med; 1996 May; 334(18):1174-7. PubMed ID: 8602185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physicians' attitudes toward health care rationing.
Perneger TV; Martin DP; Bovier PA
Med Decis Making; 2002; 22(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11833666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public preferences for prevention versus cure: what if an ounce of prevention is worth only an ounce of cure?
Ubel PA; Spranca MD; Dekay ML; Hershey JC; Asch DA
Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 9566447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel.
Shmueli A; Golan O; Paolucci F; Mentzakis E
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():18. PubMed ID: 28373904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the role of order effects in person trade-off elicitations.
Ubel PA; Richardson J; Baron J
Health Policy; 2002 Aug; 61(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 12088891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How stable are people's preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients?
Ubel PA
Soc Sci Med; 1999 Oct; 49(7):895-903. PubMed ID: 10468394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of framing as gain versus loss on understanding and hypothetical treatment choices: survival and mortality curves.
Armstrong K; Schwartz JS; Fitzgerald G; Putt M; Ubel PA
Med Decis Making; 2002; 22(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 11833668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. People's willingness to accept overdetection in cancer screening: population survey.
Van den Bruel A; Jones C; Yang Y; Oke J; Hewitson P
BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h980. PubMed ID: 25736617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Examining the attitudes and preferences of health care decision-makers in relation to access, equity and cost-effectiveness: a discrete choice experiment.
Ratcliffe J; Bekker HL; Dolan P; Edlin R
Health Policy; 2009 Apr; 90(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18937994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's provider preferences for basic gynecology care in a large health maintenance organization.
Schmittdiel J; Selby JV; Grumbach K; Quesenberry CP
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 1999; 8(6):825-33. PubMed ID: 10495263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.
Baji P; García-Goñi M; Gulácsi L; Mentzakis E; Paolucci F
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 26296623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Robust Are Value Judgments of Health Inequality Aversion? Testing for Framing and Cognitive Effects.
Ali S; Tsuchiya A; Asaria M; Cookson R
Med Decis Making; 2017 Aug; 37(6):635-646. PubMed ID: 28441098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: A partial explanation of why Oregon's cost-effectiveness list failed.
Ubel PA; Loewenstein G; Scanlon D; Kamlet M
Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 8778528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization.
Nayaradou M; Berchi C; Dejardin O; Launoy G
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19692710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risky decision making across three arenas of choice: are younger and older adults differently susceptible to framing effects?
Rönnlund M; Karlsson E; Laggnäs E; Larsson L; Lindström T
J Gen Psychol; 2005 Jan; 132(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15685961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Predicts Patient Preferences for High- and Low-Benefit Care.
Scherer LD; Shaffer VA; Caverly T; DeWitt J; Zikmund-Fisher BJ
Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 31975657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
