These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11386919)

  • 1. The role of local institutional review boards in protecting human research subjects.
    Burman WJ; Schooley RT
    JAMA; 2001 Jun; 285(21):2713. PubMed ID: 11386919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability among institutional review boards and the value of local research context.
    Clark DC
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Feb; 29(2):444-5. PubMed ID: 11246330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Institutional review boards: a crisis in confidence.
    Levine RJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jan; 134(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 11177321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of human subjects in experimentation. Institutional review boards: purposes, protocols, legal responsibilities.
    Knepper JD
    J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Oct; 53(5):97-101. PubMed ID: 10298700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems with Institutional Review Board inconsistency.
    Veatch RM
    JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 7045427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The crisis in local institutional review boards.
    Sugar AM
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Mar; 136(5):410-1; author reply 410-1. PubMed ID: 11874319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review boards: a system 'in jeopardy'?
    Marshall E
    Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5371):1830-1. PubMed ID: 9669930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The crisis in local institutional review boards.
    Nagy-Agren S
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Mar; 136(5):410-1; author reply 410-1. PubMed ID: 11874320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inconsistency and institutional review boards.
    Goldman J; Katz MD
    JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 7045428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Institutional review boards: the public safety net.
    Adams J
    J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 1995 Apr; 12(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 7612202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
    Edgar H; Rothman DJ
    Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward protecting the safety of participants in clinical trials.
    Califf RM; Morse MA; Wittes J; Goodman SN; Nelson DK; DeMets DL; Iafrate RP; Sugarman J
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Jun; 24(3):256-71. PubMed ID: 12757992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial.
    Stair TO; Reed CR; Radeos MS; Koski G; Camargo CA;
    Acad Emerg Med; 2001 Jun; 8(6):636-41. PubMed ID: 11388939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of institutional support in protecting human research subjects.
    Sugarman J
    Acad Med; 2000 Jul; 75(7):687-92. PubMed ID: 10926018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current experience of central versus local ethics approval in multicentre studies.
    Watling MI; Dewhurst JK
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1993 Oct; 27(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 8018149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards.
    Burman WJ; Reves RR; Cohn DL; Schooley RT
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jan; 134(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 11177319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Growing pains: central review board project still developing.
    Randal J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 May; 95(9):636-7. PubMed ID: 12734305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bad science and the role of institutional review boards.
    Silverman WA
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2000 Dec; 154(12):1183-4. PubMed ID: 11115298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges in human subject protection.
    Nightingale SL
    Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 10343016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. India. New guidelines promise stronger bioethics.
    Bagla P
    Science; 2000 Nov; 290(5493):919. PubMed ID: 11184730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.